Showing posts with label cold war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cold war. Show all posts

Thursday, 23 March 2017

Swedish MPs Hold First War Drill in Decades Amid Security Concerns

In line with Sweden's somewhat hectic war preparations, manifesting itself in a rollback to a draft army and serious military budget hikes, the Swedish parliament has held its first war drills in two decades.

A delegation of about 50 Swedish lawmakers from both left-wing and ring-wing parties united in the drills which rehearsed the course of actions in the event of the threat of war or an outright conflict. The drill was held in an undisclosed location in near Stockholm, where the selected MPs rehearsed their actions to replace parliament if were war declared.
In the event of war, the Advisory Council have have the authority to convene a special War Delegation empowered to make decisions in lieu of parliament.
The drill included party leaders Anna Kinberg Batra of the Conservative Party, Annie Lööf of the Center Party, Jimmie Åkesson of the Sweden Democrats, Jan Björklund of the Liberals and Jonas Sjöstedt of the Left Party. Speaker Urban Ahlin declined to disclose the details of the maneuver for security reasons, yet commented that "it all went really well."
The last time the Swedish lawmakers held such an exercise was in 1997. Allegedly, the drill had been planned since 2014, however, the hostile situation in the world in general and the Baltic region in particular prompted the exercise.
"The worsening of the global environment played its part," Urban Ahlin told the Swedish tabloid newspaper Aftonbladet, adding that the drill would have been postponed "for a few more years" if Sweden found itself in a safer environment.
Earlier this month, Sweden announced plans to bring back conscription after roughly a decade of having a voluntary-based army, and to dust off its approximately 65,000 Cold War-era shelters to be used in the event of a nuclear war. Additionally, Sweden has been bolstering its military budget after two decades of consequently slashing its defense expenditure due to a larger focus on peacekeeping operations abroad.
These measures were justified with the need to respond to global security challenges, including what was called Russia's "assertive behavior" in the Baltic region, as well as the conflict in eastern Ukraine and Crimea's re-unification with Russia, which Swedish politicians insist on referring to as "annexation."
Last time Sweden waged a war on its territory was the Finnish war (1808-1809), which ended in disaster for Stockholm. As a result of the war, Sweden lost the eastern third of its Baltic domains (today's Finland), which were incorporated in the Russian Empire as the Grand Duchy of Finland. After the subsequent offensive campaign against Norway in 1814, Sweden has effectively avoided war for two centuries.


Friday, 19 February 2016

US Navy in Talks To Use Iceland's Keflavik Air Base Again


HELSINKI — The government of Iceland is engaged in a dialogue with the United States over the proposed future deployment of Navy P-8 Poseidon submarine "hunter" aircraft from a renovated Keflavik Air Base.

The US Navy, which withdrew aircraft assets and personnel from the airport in 2006, plans to spend an initial $22 million to renew hangar facilities and restore infrastructure at Keflavik as part of a project to house P-8 Poseidon reconnaissance aircraft for maritime patrol operations in the North Atlantic.

The capital investment plan is included in the US Defense Department’s 2017 fiscal budget. Under the proposal, the Navy would use Keflavík Air Base to house P-8 Poseidon aircraft as needed. In effect, this would give the Navy the capacity to establish regular patrol rotations at the base in the future.

Iceland’s prime minister, Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson, said the US plan would add a new tier of security to the defense of the North Atlantic island.

However, Gunnlaugsson added that in ongoing discussions the US has made no mention of locating a permanent force at Keflavik at the level that existed before 2006 when the Navy operated P-3 Orion planes to police North Atlantic waters around Iceland and Greenland.

At peak, about 2,500 US Navy and Air Force personnel were stationed at the Keflavík Naval Air Station.

"The US proposal for Keflavik is welcome, but we have had no talks about increased operations from there. Should more flights and operations happen, then this is already covered under our current defense agreements with the US," said Gunnlaugsson,

The Navy’s decision to withdraw from Iceland in 2006 happened against a backdrop that saw the US shift its operational focus in Europe away from the North Atlantic and toward the Mediterranean Sea.

Established in 1951, the Keflavik Naval Air Station became an important base for the US as it is strategically located midway between the United States’ East Coast and Europe. It allowed Navy P-3 Orion and fighter aircraft to patrol Arctic and sub-Arctic ocean waters in the North Atlantic between Greenland, Iceland and Britain.

Recent inter-government discussions with the US have focused increasing on Iceland’s concerns over a surge in the activity of Russian military aircraft and submarines in the air and waters around the island. Russian activity, according to Iceland, is now running at levels not witnessed since the end of the Cold War.

Under a treaty signed in 1951, the US continues to be responsible for the defense of Iceland, which has a small coast guard but no standing army or military organization. Since 2008, Iceland’s air space has been patrolled by NATO allies as part of the Icelandic Air Policing operation

Wednesday, 13 August 2014

US, UK nuclear submarines constantly on duty in Barents Sea — Russian Navy

(Cold War days on 'sneakies' in the Barents Sea and NEVER detected by the Soviet Armed Forces)
 
US and British multirole nuclear submarines are “virtually constantly on duty” in the Barents Sea, a highly-placed source in the Russian Navy Main Staff said on Tuesday.

“American and British multirole nuclear submarines sail into the Barents Sea and attempt to reconnoiter the positions of the Northern Fleet submarines and coastal military facilities. They stay beyond the 12-mile maritime zone that constitutes Russia’s territorial waters. These are the so-called high seas where the presence of foreign ships, including submarines, is not prohibited,” the source said.
 
American multirole submarines are operating off Russia’s coast in the Pacific “on a permanent basis” as well, the source added.
 
“American nuclear submarines sail mainly into the Sea of Okhotsk and less frequently into the Barents Sea, obviously trying to monitor the activity of the Pacific Fleet’s main submarine base at Vilyuchinsk in Kamchatka,” the source said.
 
“French nuclear submarines do not enter our seas. We haven’t spotted them there,” he added.

The official noted that no strategic American or British nuclear submarines had been spotted off Russian coasts.
 
On August 7, the Northern Fleet detected a foreign submarine, presumably an American Virginia-class one, and “pushed” it out of Russia’s boundary waters. A group of surface ships and an anti-submarine plane were sent over to the area to locate the submarine.
 
The Navy Main Staff said “this is not the only such spotting of foreign submarines in the Barents Sea of late”.
 
Note from Blogger - I spent many happy times on 'sneakies' in the Barents Sea during the Cold War on UK boats and together with our US boats we were NEVER detected.

Sunday, 10 August 2014

Ukraine Kicks Ass


Ukraine 79th Paratroopers Brigade recive a hereos welcome after defeating Russian Murdering Thugs


Ukraine Fights Back Against Putins Murdering Thugs


Ukraine - Russian Roulette -The American Volunteer


Ukraine - Russian Roulette


Ukraine - Russian Roulette

Tuesday, 2 July 2013

China, Russia in largest-ever joint naval drills

China will join Russia later this week for its largest-ever naval drills with a foreign partner, underscoring deepening ties between the former Cold War rivals along with Beijing's desire for closer links with regional militaries.

China has long been a key customer for Russian military hardware, but only in the last decade have their militaries begun taking part in joint exercises.

China's Defense Ministry said Tuesday that its navy will send four destroyers, two guided missile frigates, and a support ship for the "Joint Sea-2013" exercises, which start Friday in the Sea of Japan and run through July 12. The ships departed Monday from the port of Qingdao, where China's Northern Fleet is based, headed for the rallying point in Peter the Great Bay near Vladivostok.

"This marks our navy's single biggest deployment of military force in a China-foreign joint exercise," the ministry said.

Gen. Fang Fenghui, the People's Liberation Army chief of the general staff, announced the exercises during a visit to Moscow, where he met with his Russian counterpart, Valery Gerasimov. The two also announced that another round of anti-terrorism joint drills would be held in Russia's Ural Mountain region of Chelyabinsk from July 27 to Aug. 15.

In comments reported by the official Liberation Army Daily, Fang emphasized that outsiders should not consider the exercises threatening.

"The joint drill conducted by the two militaries of China and Russia do not target any third parties. Their aim is to deepen cooperation between the two militaries in the training field, boost capacity in coordinating military activities, and serve the purpose of safeguarding regional security and stability," Fang said.

China began deploying ships to the anti-piracy flotilla off the coast of Somalia in 2008 and in recent years its navy has joined in a series of joint drills in the Pacific and Indian oceans. Chinese land units also have taken part in border security and anti-terrorism exercises organized by the six-nation Shanghai Cooperation Organization.

Cooperation with the U.S. Navy, the predominant maritime force in the region, has been more limited, although China will take part next year in the U.S.-organized multinational Rim of the Pacific exercises, the world's largest maritime exercise.

Tuesday, 23 April 2013

Russia to Deploy Fighter Jets in Belarus - Defense Minister

Russia plans to base fighter jets at a military airbase in Belarus, with a first wing due to arrive there later this year, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said on Tuesday. 

“In 2013 we will establish a military commandant’s office and provide a wing of combat fighters on alert duty,” he said, adding more jets could be based there later.

“We hope that an Air Force regiment will be here by 2015 to protect our borders,” he said.
Russia will also deliver four battalions of S-300 surface-to-air missiles to Belarus in 2014, Shoigu said. 

The decision to deliver the missiles was made at a meeting with Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, Shoigu said. 

Belarus borders NATO nations Poland, Latvia and Lithuania. NATO nations now fly combat air patrols from the Baltic states close to Russian airspace, an issue that has previously been viewed with concern in Moscow. 

The Collective Security Treaty Organization, a Russian-led military alliance of six former Soviet republics, plans to build an integrated air and missile defense system, the chief of the Russian military’s General Staff said in December. 

The CSTO's current members are Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Tajikistan. Uzbekistan announced it had pulled out of the organization in 2012.

So far Russia has signed agreements on creation of joint regional air defense systems with Belarus and Kazakhstan.

Friday, 2 November 2012

Russia to Keep Silo and Mobile ICBM Launchers in Future



Russia’s Strategic Missile Forces (SMF) will continue deploying silo-based and mobile ballistic missile launchers in the future, SMF Deputy Commander Lt. Gen. Valery Mazurov said on Thursday.

The two-component structure of the SMF reflects its purpose as part of Russia’s nuclear triad. Silo-based ICBMs serve as a preventive nuclear deterrent of any potential aggression while road-mobile ICBM launchers ensure the capability to respond to nuclear strikes by potential foes.

“This SMF structure will most likely remain unchanged for years or even decades to come,” Mazurov said in an interview with Rossiya 24 television.

“The composition of ICBM systems [in SMF structure] is based on a thorough analysis of potential military conflicts of varied intensity that involve the use of nuclear weapons,” the general said.

According to open sources, the SMF currently operates at least 58 silo-based SS-18 Satan ballistic missiles, 160 road-mobile Topol (SS-25 Sickle) missile systems, 50 silo-based and 18 road-mobile Topol-M (SS-27 Sickle B) systems, and 18 RS-24 Yars systems.

The SMF said last year that the Topol-M and RS-24 ballistic missiles would be the mainstay of the ground-based component of Russia's nuclear triad and would account for no less than 80 percent of the SMF's arsenal by 2016.

Friday, 21 September 2012

Minuteman Missiles: Hidden In The Heartland



On August 4, 1996, Paul Jensen did something he never thought he would do. He blew up a piece of his ranch land— the same land that his grandfather had homesteaded nearly 100 years earlier.

It was a clear, crisp morning when he pushed the button that set off a large underground explosion. A few hundred yards away a plume of concrete dust spread into the air with a poof and then fell back to earth. The handful of men standing with Jensen cheered and applauded.

Technically Jensen was not detonating anything on his land. More than thirty years earlier his father had signed that particular plot over to the U.S. government in perpetuity, for national defense.

From 1963 to 1994, a Minuteman intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) was implanted there, buried some three stories belowground in a silo, a concrete shell hardened to protect it from a potential nuclear attack. The small plot of land required for the missile— just two acres—was protected from the world with an eight-foot-tall chain-link fence.

Inside the fence the land was barely distinguishable from the surrounding plains—a few antennas, level ground, and a concrete silo lid were the only markers of Armageddon. If the Soviets wanted to pick a fight (something this missile was supposed to ensure they did not do), they would have something coming to them.

Actually they would have a lot coming to them. Between 1961 and 1967 the U.S. Air Force buried 1,000 Minuteman missiles across tens of thousands of square miles of the Great Plains. For three decades those missiles remained underground, cloistered on constant alert, capable of delivering their payload—a 1.2-megaton nuclear warhead—to target in less than 30 minutes.

This is how some Americans lived the Cold War. Never before had the military permanently implanted its weapons amidst the population and expected life to go on as usual. People living in the missile fields were to pretend that they did not notice the chainlink fences, the high-frequency antennas, or the lumbering Air Force trucks. With a few exceptions, they were not asked to move or relocate.

On the contrary, they were told that living a half mile from a missile silo was no big deal, that their cattle could graze on pastures nearby, that they could get close to the fence. One of the missile silos was a few hundred yards from a school.

During that time Jensen drove by that two-acre plot of land in the middle of his ranch, stopping at times to think about the missile buried there. Often he stopped just to wonder about the runoff that seemed to bleach the color out of the grass and soil—dead spots spilling out from under the edges of a government-issued chainlink fence.

For Jensen, blowing up the silo brought satisfaction—getting rid of the scar on the land, having a full ranch back, saying good-bye to the military, going back to the way things used to be.

Of course, the way things used to be was a long time off now. Much had changed since the day in 1961 when someone from the Pentagon came and told Paul’s father, Leonel, that his land had been selected to house a nuclear missile.

For one, the Cold War was over, which was why the missile could come out. The international struggle that had for decades cleaved the world into two spheres had crumbled along with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. In those years, South Dakota lost nearly 30 percent of its rural population, a sign of a collapsing farm economy. Paul Jensen was one of them: he had moved from the family ranch house, opting instead to live in Rapid City for the economic and social opportunities there. After nearly a century in the family, the ranch was now run by farmhands.

It may have seemed particularly peculiar, then, that blowing up a missile silo was so anticlimactic. A poof of smoke and the ground caved in. An outsider would not notice the difference. The wind did not stop its relentless howl to note the passing of an era. Indeed, if one were looking for continuity across the decades, something steady amidst all the change, perhaps it could be found in this land, the rolling prairie of western South Dakota—the short, tight grasses that fell and rose, interrupted only occasionally with river breaks, prairie dog towns, and exceedingly scarce and gnarled trees. The weather and the rain changed the contours of the plains, pushing and pulling and moving the heavy claylike soil. But such minute detail could not surmount the overwhelming feeling of sameness that confronted most outsiders when they entered this particular place.

It was, in fact, a sameness that was hardly broken by the presence of the Minutemen. Despite the vastness of the missile program, very few people outside of the missile fields knew much about it; certainly, few people knew where the silos were, and even the people who did know generally chose not to think about them. The Minutemen were hidden in plain sight— implanted in out-of-the-way places whose vast desolation seemed to swallow up the meaning of the weaponry. Perhaps, then, an unremarkable end to Jensen’s Minuteman silo was appropriate.

We are still meant to overlook the plains, to continue past those silences and let the remnants of concrete missile silos leach into the ground. But there is a story buried there, too, a story that belies the myth that nothing happened here during the Cold War. In a literal sense the Cold War was never fought—there was no thermonuclear war. There are no Cold War battlefields in the United States. We are told that Cold War tensions were released instead through so-called proxy wars— tragedies in Korea, Vietnam, Angola, Afghanistan, and elsewhere—allowing the Cold War to leave its mark on distant lands, providing most Americans with a comfortable detachment from the meaning of this conflict.

But scattered here and there across the Great Plains are scars: an imploded missile silo in Chugwater, Wyoming; the charred remnants of a chain-link fence near Newell, South Dakota; the extant and fully operational missile silo in Great Falls, Montana. Here are the leftovers of deterrence, the residue of the Cold War, uncomfortable reminders of what the government asked and in some cases still asks of the population and what was taken away. And within these leftovers is the story. It is a story of how Americans came to live with the Cold War, how they came to accept the tenets of nuclear deterrence and to live, in some cases, literally next door to nuclear weapons.

This is also a story that risks disappearing into its own “success.” After all, the Cold War is history. The missiles, we are told, served their purpose: there was no global war. As Jensen’s story suggests, many of the Minutemen have been deactivated, taken from the ground, and dismantled. We are told that nuclear deterrence is no longer our bulwark against global conflict. We have stepped back from the precipice. Our children no longer wake from nightmares about thermonuclear war. Our contemporary nuclear fear, a dirty bomb or rogue nuke, is of a different variety, less cataclysmic. The massive armaments of deterrence do not make sense in the age of global terror.

Not even the people of South Dakota who lived for so long with the Minutemen seem to want to tell the missiles’ stories. But these silences and spaces are as misleading as the quiet that fell over the missile fields during the Cold War.

In fact, of the 1,000 Minuteman missiles deployed in the 1960s, nearly half of them remain. Those are 450 ICBMs still capable of reaching targets around the world as quickly as you could have a pizza delivered to your door. This represents countless megatons of thermonuclear material— enough to turn the world into what journalist Jonathan Schell once warned would be a “republic of insects and grass.”

This means that thousands of Americans still live next door to Armageddon. We still require billions of dollars to staff and maintain those concrete holes in the ground.

Thursday, 26 July 2012

(Click in this link)

The groups longest Thread is about a CUP ! Only Submariners can discuss a Cup and make it interesting :)

Tuesday, 24 July 2012

Russia begins increased submarine patrols off the coasts of the United States

Many people may be surprised to know that Russian subs hunt off the waters of the eastern coast of the United States. Now there numbers are increasing. Russian military officials feel it is necessary to counteract the threat posed by the U.S.

Many people may be surprised to know that Russian subs hunt off the waters of the eastern coast of the United States. Now there numbers are increasing. Russian military officials feel it is necessary to counteract the threat posed by the U.S.

"On June 1 or a bit later we will resume constant patrolling of the world's oceans by strategic nuclear submarines," Russian navy Commander Adm. Vladimir Vysotsky said Friday. This in apparent response to the “threat” posed by the United States which has adopted a “pre-emptive war strategy” and is considered by Russia military and intelligence officials as the single largest military threat to Russia and world peace.

Unconfirmed reports suggest that Russian nuclear submarines will patrol off the coast of the eastern United States to act as a deterrent to the growing American threat.

“The Russian will also ‘bird dog’ US Naval aircraft carriers and battle groups when they patrol the world’s oceans. Make no mistake they do this to because of American wars over the past 10 years. Most American don’t seem to understand or comprehend that the US has been accused of serious war crimes, that include such things as “crimes against humanity, wars of aggressions, violations of international laws, genocide, terrorism, financing terrorism”, just to name a few (see article: “Will the ICC Act? Indictment against NATO”

 “These are very serious allegations, backed up by evidence”, says Roger Gravano of Charlotte, a human rights activist. “Mainstream media here in the United States will never report real news”, he said.

ACTIVE PATROLS

The number of annual routine patrols made by Russian submarines has dropped from more than 230 in 1984 to less than 10 today, RIA Novosti reported. That is all set to change because of recent actions taken by the United States, which may wage a pre-emptive war against Iran and Syria in the near future.

ADDING BOREY CLASS SUBS

The Russian navy has suspended its plan to dispose of its 12 nuclear-powered strategic submarines currently in service until 2020, in addition they will add 8 new Borey-class strategic submarines will be built. Borey class subs are considered some of the most advanced in the world.

The Borei class (Russian: Борей; sometimes transliterated as Borey, also known as the Dolgorukiy class after the name of the lead vessel, the Yuriy Dolgorukiy) is a class of nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine produced and operated by the Russian Navy.

The class is intended to replace the older Delta III, Delta IV and Typhoon classes now in Russian Navy service.

The class is named after Boreas, the North wind.

Advances include a compact and integrated hydrodynamically efficient hull for reduced broadband noise and the first ever use of pump-jet propulsion on a Russian nuclear submarine. Costing some 23 bln RUR ($890 million USD), Borei is approximately 170 metres (560 ft) long, 13 metres (43 ft) in diameter, and has a maximum submerged speed of at least 46 kilometres per hour (25 kn; 29 mph). In comparison the cost of an Ohio class SSBN was around 2 billion USD per boat (1997 prices).

Smaller than the Typhoon class, the Borei was initially slated to carry 12 missiles but was able to carry 4 more due to the decrease in mass of the 45-ton Bulava SLBM (a modified version of the Topol-M ICBM) over the originally proposed R-39UTTH Bark. It should be noted that a fifth generation successor/supplement is already in development as of the publication of this report.

All this is to help counter act the growing threat posed by the United States which has been actively engaged in waging wars around the world.

Tuesday, 17 July 2012

Last Cold War Russian Nuclear Sub Scrap Contract


Russia contracts with Italy for decommissioning the last remaining Northern Fleet nuclear submarine no longer in operation

But 'Barents Observer' notes there are still more than 70 reactor compartments to be taken safely onshore from storage in Saida Bay, west of Murmansk near the border with Norway.

Rosatom, Russia’s State Atomic Energy Corporation has for years been looking for a funder to cover the costs of scrapping the last of the 120 retired nuclear powered submarines that sailed in the Northern fleet during the Cold War. Now, Italy agrees to pay €7 million to cut out the reactor-compartment from the submarine, currently laid up at Nerpa naval yard on the Kola Peninsula, according to 'AtomInfo'.

The United States will grant €1 million to cover the cost of transportation of the spent nuclear fuel from the submarines two reactors to Russia’s reprocessing plant in Mayak in the South Urals.

The deal is a part of the funding provided via the Global Partnership against the spread of weapons and materials of mass destruction, initiated by the G8 countries in 2002.

Although the submarines are cut up and the metal is sent to recycling, the reactor compartments are still highly radioactive and must be stored safely onshore for decades. For that purpose, a huge onshore storage pad is built in the Saida Bay, west of Murmansk towards the border to Norway.

The Russian Northern fleet still has more than 20 nuclear powered submarines in operation and several more are under testing and construction.

Monday, 16 July 2012

What Is Still Sacred In Russia

The Russian government is trying to find out who is making a fortune with thousands of homes provided for the families of career soldiers during the Cold War. This is yet another mysterious situation arising out of the difficult transition of the Russian military from the Cold War era "Red Army" to the much smaller armed forces of the Russian Federation.

Reducing and reforming the Russian military has been difficult and has produced a lot of corrupt practices. That's how we got to the mystery over who actually owns many the of homes built for military families. Since the number of people in the military has shrunk 80 percent in the last two decades, there should be a lot of surplus military family housing. In fact, there isn't. This arises from a common practice during the Soviet period (1921-91) when factories, universities, and organizations of all sorts established separate towns or neighborhoods for their employees. These were literally "company towns" as was sometimes found in the West, especially during the 19th century. These towns contained housing, schools, utilities, shops and municipal services. The owning organization provided the money to pay for all this.

When the Cold War ended and a lot of the state-owned "companies" these company towns belonged to were sold off or went bankrupt. At that point the company towns were found to be very valuable. That's because there had always been a housing shortage during the Soviet period, and now you could charge whatever the market would bear for whatever housing you could get possession of.

Most of the military company towns were not sold off, despite repeated orders from the government to do so. What actually happened was that many unneeded military towns were taken over by retired officers. Several hundred thousand officers were forced to retire after 1991, and letting them stay in their military housing seemed like a prudent solution to a potentially explosive situation. This was often done without consulting with government departments in charge of selling off surplus property. Most of the retired officers, and their families, had no place to live if they were evicted. Most of the retired officers were not being replaced because the units they served in had been disbanded. Military bases, adjacent to their company towns, were easy to sell off, as the government ordered. But no one wanted to be responsible for tossing retired officers, and their families, out into the street. These guys were being paid tiny pensions and were pretty poor already. So the government chose to simply look the other way as many retired or fired officers were allowed to remain in their homes.

But now it's become widely known that a lot of this military housing is occupied by the children of the retired officers or someone else entirely. While the retired officers did not own the housing they were living in, housing was still in short supply and tenants were easy to find for this housing. You were technically breaking the law living there and could find yourself evicted if the government ever got around to actually selling off these company towns.

Eventually, there will be very few retired officers (or their elderly widows) left living in this military housing, but politicians are daring each other to "clean up the mess" and at least take back the houses inhabited by civilians. It's doubtful if the government will ever dare to move against the retired officers. Some things are still, more or less, sacred in Russia. But Russian politicians are still being criticized for not selling off this surplus military housing, which no one wanted to admit was not really surplus.