Showing posts with label veterans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label veterans. Show all posts

Thursday, 4 October 2012

More Navy Women Joining the Silent Service



Thirty Years Ago: Ensign Roberta McIntyre, the first female to qualify as a surface weapons officer, checking the main gauge board in the propulsion plant of the submarine tender USS Dixon, where she served as electrical officer.

The Navy has announced that women officers will start to be assigned to Virginia-class attack submarines as soon as next year. And that enlisted women would likely follow.

It also is assigning women to five more crews of the larger Trident-class submarines starting January 2013. There are currently 24 women assigned to submarines as of August 30. There are another 24 female officers in the submarine training pipeline, with 18 more waiting to enter after them.

The primary reason for this expansion is the lack of opportunity for advancement and increased responsibility. Naval leaders found in the early 1980s that restricting women to a limited type of ship (tenders, repair ships, and a training carrier) virtually prohibited them from serving in increasingly responsible billets up the chain of command that would eventually lead to command at sea.

Many female surface warfare officers left the Navy in the mid-1980s because there was no career path. By 1987 the “Combat Logistic Force” ships (ships that provided food, fuel and ammunition via underway replenishment) opened, and in 1994 women were being assigned to surface combatants. The Navy does not want to repeat the mistake of spending thousands of dollars in training prospective submarine officers, only to have them leave the submarine force for lack of submarines for them to serve aboard.

As then-Chief of Naval Personnel Admiral Ronald Zlatoper emphasized in May 1993, during testimony to Congress at the hearings to open combatant surface ships to women, changes to the assignment of women in ships is evolutionary, not revolutionary.

He said it is, “a logical progression after 50 years of service by Navy women…including 20 years in naval aviation and 15 years at sea.” Well, women have now been in naval aviation for 40 years and in ships for 35 years…it is certainly time for women to be assigned to submarines without the broo-ha-ha we are still seeing in letters to the editor of Navy Times because of a fraternization scandal involving a Naval Academy female midshipman and the chief of the boat — the top enlisted sailor — aboard the USS Nebraska, a ballistic-missile submarine.

Part of the problem is that it is a major personnel policy change, which always seems to throw men for a loop.

Naval tradition personified both the sea and ships as female, which provided both comfort and tragedy. Many naval traditions and folklore sprang from the relationship of women, the sea and ships, and women on board ships were actually considered to be good luck. There are also historical accounts of women leading their nations in war, on both land and sea. Nevertheless, the U.S. Navy did not allow women as permanent members of ships’ crews until 1978, late in the 20th century.

This created an ethos of exclusion and male privilege that persists to this day.

I am frankly tired of hearing the same old whiny reasons why women should not serve on submarines: that there’s no value-added to having women aboard; it’s pushing a social agenda to the detriment of readiness; the lack of privacy and tight quarters guarantee some physical contact will occur [and?]; the wives won’t like it.

One compelling reason for allowing women to serve is a growing shortage of men willing to do so. Four years ago, the Naval Academy produced only 92 male officers for submarine duty, short of its 120-man requirement. Submariners must be volunteers, and satisfy strict physical, psychological and academic qualifications. Beyond that, more women — and fewer men — are getting technical degrees.

The bottom line is this: the Navy needs the women to maintain adequate personnel levels. And as always, the needs of the Navy take precedence over any individual point of view.

I close with a remark made by a Navy woman nearly 20 years ago to Navy Times:

I did not join the Navy to advance a social program, file subjective harassment suits, get pregnant, and accidentally carry out my assigned military mission in the process. I joined to serve my country.


Wednesday, 18 July 2012

Veterans push Marines to break with UFC


Commandant Gen. Jim Amos can expect to receive a letter from some unhappy veterans calling on the Marine Corps to sever its ties with the Ultimate Fighting Championship.

The veterans committee of a union group, Unite Here, is not happy about the money the Corps has spent on sponsorship and partnered recruiting videos with the UFC. But they’re not stopping with just the Corps. They’re supporting a full ban on military spending on professional sports.

The group has compiled a video montage highlighting what it perceives as the UFC’s bad behavior. The video shows footage of fighters making sexually charged comments toward female reporters, sometimes even touching them inappropriately while doing so. The video can be viewed at UnfitForTheCorps.org.

“There’s a huge effort at the highest level of command in the Navy and Marine Corps to promote a zero-tolerance policy for sexual assault within the ranks of the armed forces,” Pat Lamborn, director of recruiting and training with the union group, told Marine Corps Times. “We hold champion basketball and football players accountable because they’re public figures. Marines are also held accountable for their behavior, so why aren’t these guys?”

Marine Corps Recruiting Command has teamed up over the past three years with the UFC on commercials highlighting the warrior spirit connection between the two organizations. UFC viewers are the MCRC’s target audience for potential enlisted and officer recruit prospects.

The issues presented by the union group about a handful of competitors and leaders are an area of concern that has been addressed with the UFC, said Maj. John Caldwell, an MCRC spokesman.

“We are monitoring the issue and continuously evaluate the effectiveness of our advertising and lead generation partnerships,” he said. “If corrective action is not implemented, we reserve the option to respond accordingly.”

The union represents 250,000 workers in the hotel, gaming, food service, manufacturing, textile, distribution, laundry and airport industries. It plans to deliver 5,000 petitions to recruiting stations in seven cities, including Chicago, Los Angeles and Washington. And it’s not the first time the group has criticized those tied to the UFC.

The owners of the UFC, brothers Frank and Lorenzo Fertitta, own Station Casinos in Las Vegas. Unite Here has about 60,000 members based there, according to Lamborn. The group’s Vegas affiliate, Culinary Workers Union Local 226, has blasted the brothers for the anti-union management of their casinos.

In 2010, the culinary workers group filed 201 charges against the casinos after they said workers’ attempts to unionize were squelched. Most of the charges were dismissed following a seven-month trial that ended in May 2011, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal. The union group had tried for 15 years, without success, to organize 13,000 Station employees, the Review-Journal reported.

The call to cut the funding also coincides with the Army’s recent decision to end its decade-long sponsorship of NASCAR following pressure from lawmakers to stop defense spending on sports sponsorship.

The UFC could not be reached immediately for comment.

Friday, 6 July 2012

Big dip in unemployment rate for young veterans

The jobless rate for Iraq and Afghanistan veterans fell dramatically in June despite an overall economy that produced few jobs and left the national unemployed rate unchanged.

The unemployment rate for Iraq- and Afghanistan-era veterans fell to 9.5 percent, down from 12.7 percent the previous month and from 13.3 percent in June 2011, according to the employment situation report released Friday by the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics.

For veterans of all generations, the June jobless rate was 7.4 percent, a slight improvement over the 7.8 percent rate for May.

The national unemployment rate remains 8.2 percent in a sour economy that produced just 80,000 jobs last month.


Young vets unemployment rates

The unemployment rate for post-2001 veterans for the six months prior to June:

• May 2012: 12.7 percent.

• April 2012: 9.2 percent.

• March 2012: 10.3 percent.

• February 2012: 7.6 percent.

• January 2012: 9.1 percent.

• December 2011: 13.3 percent.


Big month-to-month changes in veterans’ unemployment can be the result of statistical flukes because the Labor Department’s monthly report is based on a survey of about 200,000 people, of whom just 22,000 are veterans. The June survey included just 2,600 people who left active duty since Sept. 11, 2001, to draw conclusions about the jobless rate for the newest generation of veterans.

Still, the statistical improvement comes amidst a continuing expansion of federal and private-sector programs aimed at helping veterans get jobs.

The Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Chamber of Commerce jointly sponsored a hiring fair in Detroit last week that officials said resulted in 1,300 job offers going to veterans, and there are plans to hold similar events in other locations.

VA also announced Tuesday that it is helping veteran-owned small businesses by exceeding its own goal for purchasing goods and services from veteran- and disabled veteran-owned firms. More than 18 percent of procurement dollars went to disabled veteran-owned businesses, exceeding the goal of 10 percent set by VA Secretary Eric Shinseki, and 20 percent went to veteran-owned businesses, exceeding the goal of 12 percent, VA officials said.

A series of grants also have been announced to encourage hiring veterans. For example, the Transportation Department announced Monday that it is awarding grants to improve transportation access so that veterans and their families could reach jobs.

Just before the report was released, Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America announced a new partnership with New York’s Lincoln Center for Performing Arts that will provide “fast track” hiring procedures for veterans to fill a variety of jobs at the center. The partnership also involves providing free tickets for veterans and their families to some events.

More programs are coming.

More than 25,000 unemployed veterans, aged 35 to 60, have signed up to take part in the first phase of a two-year job training program, the Veterans Reemployment Assistance Program or VRAP, that provides one year of monthly GI Bill benefits to those enrolled in education or vocational training programs that should qualify them at the end for a job in a high-demand skills.

There is still room in the program, which can sign up 45,000 veterans now and another 54,000 veterans beginning in October.

Saturday, 9 June 2012

Veteran cemeteries expand to meet demand

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs has a goal to have a cemetery within 75 miles of 90 percent of every veteran.