The Pakistani policy of covertly supporting and encouraging
Islamic terrorist groups began in the late 1970s and after September 11, 2001 were increasingly out of
Pakistani control. Pakistan
found itself in the position of continuing to support Islamic terrorists who
attacked India
and Afghanistan
while fighting a growing number of disaffected terrorist groups at home that
had declared war on Pakistan .
The Arab Spring uprisings were a popular movement to replace
the many dictatorships and monarchies that have long been the cause of most of
the poverty and unhappiness that have made the Middle East
such an economic, educational, scientific, military and cultural backwater. But
these uprisings made the mistake of accepting Islamic terrorist groups, who had
long been trying to overthrow all these authoritarian rulers, as allies. The
Islamic terrorists considered the secular democrats who sparked and sustained
the Arab Spring as competitors for power, not allies in creating new democracies.
This misreading of the Islamic terrorist groups (most of whom consider
democracy un-Islamic) proved to be very expensive in terms of lives, property
damage and economic losses in general.
These popular rebellions led to the fall of several long time dictatorships,
and a rush to reform (or give the appearance of such) by most other Arab
governments. The Arab Spring also proved a major boost for Islamic terrorist
morale and numbers.
The result was a huge spike in Islamic terrorist violence.
For the Arab Spring countries it meant prolonged unrest and more deaths. Worse,
it isn't over, especially in Syria ,
Yemen , Bahrain
and Algeria .
Over 160,000 have died so far in the Arab Spring countries, and millions more
wounded, imprisoned or driven from their homes. The financial cost, so far, has
been over a trillion dollars. Most of that is the economic damage from
shrinking GDP. The rest is destruction of buildings and possessions. The lost
wages and reduced economic activity have been particularly difficult for populations
that were poor to begin with. Egypt ,
Tunisia , Libya ,
Syria , Jordan ,
Lebanon and Bahrain
have suffered most from the unrest, losing up to a third of their GDP because
of the Arab Spring economic disruption. Then there is the cost in cash for wealthier
monarchies and dictatorships that have spent money (sometimes borrowed) to
placate their restless populations. The money spent here is not all Arab. The
Assad dictatorship of Syria
has been kept afloat by billions of dollars in support from Iran ,
and much smaller amounts from Russia .
There has also been some unrest in non-Arab Moslem nations because of Arab
Spring and that has cost billions to deal with.
In the midst of all this revolutionary exuberance thousands
of very hard core Islamic terrorists were released from prison. The overthrown
governments were bad in many ways, but they were good at catching (and often
promptly killing) Islamic terrorists who threatened them. This was the main
reason al Qaeda decided in the 1990s to make war on the United
States and the West. These foreigners were
easier targets than the thugs (or tribes) with flags back home. By recycling
all these imprisoned Islamic terrorists after 2011 the terrorists now had the
ability to do a lot more damage. As usual most of it was done against fellow
Moslems. The Islamic world in general and the Arab world in particular has long
been reluctant to confront the most dangerous aspect of their religion; the
enthusiasm for terrorism and savagery in the name of God and the greater good.
This has never worked and those who point this out tend to get shouted down or
killed for preaching heresy. Islam needs some serious reform but few Moslems
are eager to rebel against the tyranny of religious extremism.
The "Arab Spring" created several unexpected
popular uprisings against dictators and monarchs. Most sort-of succeeded
(Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, Libya), while others failed or never got going
(Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Algeria, Morocco, Lebanon) and Syria is not
over but the rebels are still a contender despite Iranian intervention. None of
these uprisings developed into a true war. The most violent, in Libya ,
was won by armed civilians assisted by NATO smart bombs and warships. Libya ,
like the other uprisings involving heavy combat, were a collection of dozens of
separate battles over a large area.
The uprisings were mostly about corruption and the resulting
widespread poverty and bad government. For that reason, the Saudi Arabian
monarchy was able to buy its way out of an uprising. Yemen
mutated into low level civil war, while Syria
grew into a countrywide guerilla war. Egypt
and Tunisia
were over quickly but subsequent elections put Islamic conservatives in power,
and then out of power as the voters realized what the Islamic radicals (a
religious dictatorship).
In Egypt
the military was able to maintain its corrupt grip on the economy. It's unclear
how this will turn out because the Islamic and secular rebel groups are
spending most of their time going after each other. Indeed, the biggest problem
was that these dictatorships were not just the single dictator but that the
segment of the population that kept the dictator in power and were well
rewarded for doing that. These privileged groups were not eager to flee or give
up their wealth. The dictator's supporters are striving to retain or regain
their power. The Old Order has substantial economic and political resources and
is willing to use them to retain power and wealth.
This arrangement was common to all Muslem nations, not just
the Arab ones. Islam has a particular fondness for preserving ancient practices
and traditions. Not all Muslems agree with this but the most traditional
believers have long relied on violence and terrorism to block social, political
and economic change. Thus the Muslem nations tend to be quite poor and backward
compared to the rest of the world.
The Arab Spring is part of another reform movement in that
is trying to address the root causes of poverty, corruption and mismanagement
that are so common in the Islamic world. Naturally, a lot of vested interests,
both secular and religious, are resisting these changes. The worst of the
opposition is an ancient one, religious fanatics selling a radical solution
that not enough Moslems want to buy into.
No comments:
Post a Comment