An IED attack on a paramilitary convoy in Peshawar on Sunday has once
again drawn attention to Pakistan’s lack of suitable vehicles to combat
what will likely remain terrorists’ favored mode of attack.
The
Associated Press of Pakistan quoted an official saying the IED was
composed of mortar rounds and improvised explosives weighing some 40
kilograms hidden in a car parked by the roadside and detonated once the
convoy drew close.
However, nearby women and children appeared to make up the majority of the 14 dead and approximately 20 injured.
Nevertheless,
it has highlighted the continuing threat from such devices, and the
lack of suitable MRAP vehicles in sufficient number for the security
services.
The threat was further underlined today by the death of
four soldiers in and IED attack near Miranshah in Northern Waziristan in
the Federally Administered Tribal Areas bordering Afghanistan.
With
the drawdown of ISAF forces in neighboring Afghanistan, Pakistan has
been mentioned in media reports as being in line to receive some surplus
US equipment.
The equipment does not include MRAP vehicles, many of which are reported to be scrapped in Afghanistan.
When
contacted for clarification on what surplus equipment Pakistan may
receive, the US Embassy here in Islamabad could not provide details.
A
spokesperson for the Embassy said, “Military gear that has been
determined to be excess defense articles will not be brought back with
US forces from Afghanistan as they redeploy elsewhere. The United States
intends to offer this equipment to Afghanistan and other partners, but
no final determinations have been made yet.”
The spokesperson further stated, “It is premature to speculate on what may be provided and to whom.”
Neither
Pakistan’s Ministry of Defence, nor the military’s Inter Service Public
Relations (ISPR) media branch replied to requests for clarification, or
indeed confirmation that surplus MRAP vehicles were offered to
Pakistan, but declined.
Pakistan’s indigenous MRAP vehicle, the
Burraq, manufactured by the state-owned Heavy Industries Taxila AFV
builder, also appears nowhere in sight despite Defense News being told
in March it was only a matter of months from finally being unveiled.
Former
Australian defense attaché to Islamabad, Brian Cloughley, said there
could be a good reason for such an offer being declined.
“Of
course it would be attractive to acquire such vehicles” he said, “but
the associated problems are probably too great to make this
practicable.”
While highlighting that MRAP vehicles are becoming
increasingly important in global conflicts, Cloughley says, “costs and
practicalities have to be considered.
“First of all, the vehicles
are enormously expensive. Pakistan simply couldn’t afford a
state-of-the-art MRAP vehicle. But even if they were donated by the US
on grounds that they were surplus stock [and even then, Congress might
not give approval], the operating and maintenance costs would be
enormous,” he said.
With Pakistan beset with crippling economic
woes, keeping finances tight is a major concern for the military, but
operational costs, especially against the Taliban, are already
prohibitively expensive.
“It is all too often forgotten that
Pakistan is finding it extremely difficult to meet the day-to-day costs
of military operations in the Tribal Areas, where so many thousands of
its soldiers have died in the conflict that erupted after Afghanistan
went critical,” says Cloughley.
“The expense of running ordinary
resupply vehicles, alone, is extremely high. Factor in a brand-new type
of vehicle, with requirement for training, and staggering running and
maintenance costs, and it’s a very big problem indeed,” he adds.
If
the door on surplus US counter-IED equipment has closed, the two day
visit of UK Prime Minister David Cameron over the weekend may offer
something of an alternative.
A joint statement issued during the
visit said, “The UK will work in partnership with Pakistan providing
expertise in support of Pakistan’s developing strategy on counter
terrorism. The UK will provide more equipment to tackle the scourge of
improvised explosive devices and support Pakistan in improving the
security of its infrastructure, including sharing the UK’s expertise in
safeguarding sporting events.”
However, the details of this offer
are not known, and despite requests no clarification was forthcoming
from the UK’s High Commission here in Islamabad, with a spokesperson
referring Defense News back to the joint statement.
It appears to
be part of or a follow-on from similar efforts announced in April 2011
as part of the Anglo-Pakistani Strategic Dialogue.
At the time, a
spokesman at the High Commission said Britain welcomed “Pakistan’s
efforts to develop a national counter-IED strategy aimed at combating
this phenomenon using a holistic, interagency approach.”
Britain
was to help establish “a ‘center of excellence’ that will train and
equip front-line law enforcement and security forces to deal with IED
threats whenever and wherever they occur.”
British help would also
extend to dealing with the aftermath of IED attacks, specifically
“training experts to make sure that forensic evidence can be recovered
from IEDs,” in order to strengthen the legal cases against terrorist
suspects and those suspected of manufacturing and using IEDs.
This latter aspect was not thought to be a specific strong point of Pakistan’s security and law enforcement bodies at the time.
No comments:
Post a Comment