Pakistan
recently responded to the Indian “cold start” military doctrine by
announcing reforms that get reserve units into action faster and moves
active duty units to the border fast enough to counter the rapidly
approaching “cold start” Indian battle groups. This new Pakistani
doctrine comes after four years of preparation, training and studies.
A major problem with this new Pakistani doctrine is that India
has never really implemented their cold start doctrine. Although first
proposed in 2004, and occasionally discussed since then, the Indian
military was never reorganized (into smaller battle groups) to ensure
that units closest to the border were ready to join others nearby and
rapidly move into Pakistan. The basic idea was to advance 50-75
kilometers into Pakistan and thus establish a better bargaining position
when international pressure forced both countries to cease hostilities
and talk things over. This new doctrine took advantage of the known
slowness of the Pakistani Army in mobilizing for war and moving troops
to the border. The new Pakistani reforms are supposed to deal with that.
But, like the Indian non-implementation of cold start, the Pakistani
response is likely to be just as illusionary.
Meanwhile, Pakistan announced an unexpected and more realistic
change in military doctrine last year. The generals officially
recognized that internal Islamic terrorist groups are the main threat,
not an Indian invasion. This change caused many Islamic conservatives in
Pakistan to call for “true Moslems” in the military to rise up and
oppose this disturbing policy change. For over thirty years the
Pakistani military leadership has supported Islamic radicalism and many
Pakistanis are not willing to let go.
Pakistani army units on the Kashmir frontier have, for years,
made attacks on Indian troops. These attacks were denied by the
Pakistani government but tolerated by the Pakistani military high
command because they were part of a two decade old terrorism campaign in
Indian Kashmir. The Pakistani army still tolerates this kind of
terrorism from Pakistan based terrorists but officially opposes Islamic
terrorists who attack Pakistani targets. Allowing more attacks on Indian
troops in Kashmir is one way to placate the many pro-terrorism officers
and troops in the army.
Both countries still devote a large portion of their military
budgets preparing for a land war that neither is interested in fighting.
India gains little from invading Pakistan, which is a chaotic failed
state that would cost more than India would like to spend to occupy and
rehabilitate. Moreover, for the past decade both nations have had the
ability to use nuclear weapons on each other. That has forced military
leadership to frame every doctrine with the caveat; “as long as there is
no nuclear escalation.” Any invasion, no matter how limited, would risk
use of nukes by the losing side. Once the nukes fly, both sides lose,
big time.
No comments:
Post a Comment