Showing posts with label United Nations Security Council. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United Nations Security Council. Show all posts

Saturday, 23 August 2014

Truck Convoy Returns To Russia From Ukraine

The huge convoy of Russian trucks that entered war-torn eastern Ukraine on Friday, sharply escalating tensions, returned to Russia on Saturday after unloading food and medicine in the city of Luhansk, and the Russian government quickly declared its satisfaction with the operation.
Russia’s decision to send the convoy across the border without an escort by the International Red Cross or final clearance from the Ukrainian government in Kiev had drawn harsh criticism.

President Petro O. Poroshenko of Ukraine called it a “flagrant violation of international law.”

Another senior Ukrainian official denounced it as a “direct invasion.”

And Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen of NATO, in a statement condemning the convoy’s entry, said it coincided with a “major escalation in Russian military involvement in eastern Ukraine.”

The convoy’s swift return suggested that, at least for a moment, the government of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had scored a public relations victory.

Russian television stations, largely controlled by the government, had carried constant coverage of the convoy crossing the border on Friday, after the Russian Foreign Ministry declared the humanitarian crisis in eastern Ukraine so grave that it could no longer tolerate what it described as stalling by the Ukrainian government and the International Committee of the Red Cross, which had agreed to oversee the convoy.

For weeks, Kiev and its allies, including the United States and major European countries, had raised suspicions about Russia’s plans to deliver humanitarian aid, fearing that the trucks could be used to carry weapons and other supplies to pro-Russian militants who seem to be on the verge of defeat in their fight against the Ukrainian government.

There were also concerns that Russia would use the trucks to slow the Ukrainian government’s military operations in Luhansk, essentially to shield rebels as they regrouped and rearmed.

In Ukraine’s capital, Kiev, a military spokesman, Col. Andriy Lysenko, said the Ukrainian government was also hoping to defuse the situation, but he accused Russia of using some of the aid trucks to take military equipment from Ukrainian factories back to Russia.

However, he offered no evidence to support his assertion.

“The leadership of Ukraine is using all diplomatic and political means to resolve this crisis and will not allow it to develop further,” Colonel Lysenko said at a briefing for reporters.

While witnesses reported seeing more than 260 trucks in the convoy, Colonel Lysenko said that Ukrainian officials had counted 184 crossing the border on Friday and that some of them, having dropped off their cargo, were being used “to take away equipment from Ukrainian enterprises.”

He said, without offering any proof, that the equipment was taken from the Topaz plant, which makes Kolchuga, a type of radar system, and from a factory in Luhansk that produces firearms magazines.

At the briefing in Kiev, the capital, Colonel Lysenko said Russia was continuing to fire artillery and missiles at Ukrainian military positions from the Russian side of the border, repeating an accusation that Ukraine has made consistently in recent weeks.

Russia has denied direct military involvement in the conflict.

By swiftly returning the trucks to Russia, the Kremlin seemed to seize an opportunity to make its detractors in Kiev and the West appear alarmist, and the Foreign Ministry issued a statement saying the goals all along had been strictly humanitarian.

“We are satisfied that the Russian humanitarian aid for southeast Ukraine was delivered to the destination,” the Foreign Ministry said.

“We were guided in this exclusively by the goal of helping needy civilians.”

The statement added that Russia intended to work with the Red Cross to deliver the assistance.

The hasty unloading of the trucks also seemed to confirm that many of them had been nearly empty.

Journalists who were allowed to look inside some trucks had seen that many were only partly filled.

The State Border Guard Service of Ukraine’s inspections of an initial group of trucks found that most of them carried foodstuffs, including buckwheat, rice, sugar and water, and that some bore medical supplies.

The Red Cross said on Friday that fighting in eastern Ukraine made it too dangerous for the convoy to cross the border and deliver the aid.

The Russian Foreign Ministry issued a statement saying that the humanitarian crisis was worsening and that it could no longer wait.

Military experts say that there is no doubt that Russia could invade Ukraine — with tanks not cargo trucks — on extremely short notice and that the West could do little about it.

The loud criticism from Kiev and the West, however, seemed to provide the Kremlin with an easy opportunity to portray its critics as shrill and unreliable, while pushing back on hard-line Russian nationalists who have criticized Putin and his government for not doing more to help pro-Russian militants.

The Obama administration on Friday had also sharply criticized Russia’s unilateral decision to send the convoy across the border, which it said was “in violation of its previous commitments and international law.”

“Russian military vehicles painted to look like civilian trucks forced their way into Ukraine,” said a spokeswoman for the National Security Council, Caitlin Hayden.

In her statement, Ms. Hayden said that only a small number of vehicles were inspected by Ukrainian customs officials and that there was no way to know the contents of the entire convoy.

The Ukrainian government complained that its customs agents sent to a border crossing to inspect the trucks had been blocked as Russia sent the convoy through. 

The return of the trucks to Russia came as Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany arrived in Kiev to visit Ukrainian leaders.

Thursday, 27 June 2013

North Korea ‘deliberately breached’ Chinese contract over missile vehicles: U.N. report

The U.N. Security Council’s sanctions committee on North Korea has concluded that Pyongyang appears to have “deliberately breached” a contract with a Chinese company by converting Chinese lumber transporters into missile launch transporters, according to a U.N. report on Wednesday.

The 16-wheel missile launch transporter was seen at North Korea’s military parade in April last year, raising concerns that the vehicle’s design and technology might have come from China. If so, it would be a violation of U.N. resolutions that ban member states from selling “all arms and related materials” to the North.

In its annual report, the Security Council’s North Korea Sanctions Committee Panel of Experts said, citing a Chinese briefing to the committee in October last year, the Chinese company named Hubei Sanjiang Space Wanshan Special Vehicle Co. exported six lumber transporters to North Korea in 2011.

China told the committee that, “These vehicles had a substantive distinction from transporter-erector-launchers or missile transporters and could not be used for transporting or launching missiles,” according to the annual report.

The North’s Forestry Ministry Rim Mok General Trading Co. signed a contract to buy the six vehicles worth 30 million yuan (about US$4.9 million) from the Chinese company.

According to the contract, North Korea said the vehicles would be used for “transporting the timbers in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea).”

Citing an image analysis conducted by the U.N. Institute for Training and Research Operational Satellite Applications Program, the North Korean missile vehicles and the Chinese vehicles named “WS51200″ match in terms of their “fronts and sides, the fenders, the exhaust systems, fuel tanks and tires,” the U.N. report showed.

“On the basis of the information currently available, the panel considers it most likely that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea deliberately breached the end user guarantee that it officially provided to Wuhan and converted the WS51200 trucks into transporter-erector-launchers,” it said.
North Korea, which has conducted three nuclear tests since 2006, has been hit by a series of U.N. sanctions.

The U.N. panel said the U.N. sanctions have delayed the North’s development of missile and nuclear arsenal.

“Overall, the panel believes that while the imposition of sanctions has not halted the development of nuclear and ballistic missile programs, it has in all likelihood considerably delayed the timetable of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, through the imposition of financial sanctions and the bans on the trade in weapons has choked off significant funding which would have been channeled into its prohibited activities,” it said.

“In both its imports and exports, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea continues to use a variety of techniques to circumvent national controls, indicating that the imposition of sanctions has hampered its arms sales and illicit weapon programs.”

Thursday, 25 April 2013

UN Security Council Approves 11,200 Troops to Stabilize Mali

The United Nations Security Council today authorized the deployment to Mali of 11,200 peacekeepers and a separate French unit to stabilize the land-locked African nation and fight Islamist insurgents. 

The UN Security Council unanimously passed a resolution paving the way for UN peacekeepers, flanked by 1,440 police officers, to take over July 1 from about 7,000 African troops. 

As a former colonial power with the most at stake in Mali, France will maintain a presence after its January intervention that was aimed at ridding the northern part of the country of Islamist militants. The resolution says a smaller French force will be in place in the north to “use all necessary means” if Mali again comes under “imminent and serious threat.” 

The UN force “will need to take quick steps to protect vulnerable civilians and lay the groundwork to help the government address problems that gave rise to the crisis, such as a weak rule of law, impunity and deep-seated ethnic tensions,” said Philippe Bolopion, United Nations director at Human Rights Watch in New York.  “The challenges ahead are daunting.” 

France has been mapping an exit strategy for Mali for months as the UN solidifies plans to turn African forces into so-called Blue Helmets, as UN peacekeepers are often known.

Counterterrorism Focus

That managed transition to a larger UN force and France’s commitment to stay on with a focus on counterterrorism seek to respond to concerns that extremism has taken root in Mali’s sparsely inhabited north while the south is plagued by political instability, corruption and lawlessness. 

Those plans will be tested by the resilience of the jihadists and rebels groups who for 10 months controlled a vast, arid swath of Mali the size of Texas. While the French offensive drove the radicals into hiding, a pattern of guerrilla-style fighting has emerged. 

France’s Defense Ministry said today that the country’s military intervention in Mali has cost 205 million euros ($267 million) beyond what the armed forces would have spent anyway. 

The French troops, which numbered 4,000 at the height of the intervention, will be down to 2,000 by July and 1,000 by December, French Ambassador Gerard Araud  old reporters.
To contact the reporter on this story: Flavia Krause-Jackson in London at