Tony Lopez from Resistencia Malvinas, who described the campaign
against the cruise vessels calling in the Falklands a ‘success’, pledged
that every Wednesday at midday the group will be protesting at Lan
Chile’s downtown offices demanding that Aerolineas Argentinas takes over
the weekly flight to the Islands and that passports be eliminated for
Argentine nationals.
This week’s ‘Wednesday protest’ inauguration was not much of a
success because Argentine public opinion was concentrated on the
judicial reform congressional debate and massive concentrations all over
the country rejecting the proposal.
However next week could be different because the protest at Lan’s
offices will be taking place on Thursday at midday (Wednesday May first
is a national holiday), which coincides with the 31st anniversary of the
sinking of the cruiser “General Belgrano” by a British submarine with
the loss of 323 lives, Argentina’s single major setback, and which
marked the no-return escalation of the Falklands conflict.
In an interview with a local radio, Tony Lopez said that the idea of
the Lan ‘siege’ followed the success of the campaign against cruise
vessels calling in the Falklands, implementing the Gaucho Rivero Bill,
which “was confirmed by the tourism stats released by the Malvinas
illegitimate government”.
According to those stats “the cruise season was down 50% over a year
ago, because cancellation doubled and the number of visitors was much
lower than expected. This was to the benefit of Puerto Madryn and
Ushuaia”, argued Tony Lopez.
In this new campaign “we are demanding that Aerolineas Argentinas
takes over the weekly flight to Malvinas and from Argentina and that
Argentine nationals should not need passports to travel to the Islands,
as is the case now”.
The head of Resistencia Malvinas insisted on describing the cruise
campaign as a ‘success’ recalling two incidents: when his group attack
with stones and sticks against representatives’ offices from British
maritime agencies in Argentina, which included the burning of a Union
Jack, and when cruise passengers in Buenos Aires were retained by over
six hours delaying the departure of the vessel to Montevideo.
Tony Lopez went further and said that following these two incidents
and the summoning of Ambassador Alicia Castro in London by the Foreign
Office to receive a formal protest, “we became aware we had the full
support from the Argentine state”.
In effect, “when summoned to the Foreign Office Ambassador Alicia
Castro told (Foreign Secretary William) Hague that the only possible way
out to this situation was to begin negotiations over the Malvinas
sovereignty”.
“The stones we throw and break windows of the representatives of the
Malvinas usurpers in Buenos Aires have a big echo in London”, said Tony
Lopez.
Finally regarding passports, he recalled that people travelling
between Malvinas and Argentina, based on the understanding of 1971/72
only needed a ‘white card’, because it is not a foreign country, and
this is contemplated in international law. This was the case until the
1982 war.
Likewise the validity of such understandings is not erased because of
a war and remembered that when President Cristina Fernandez was a
Senator she supported a bill which established that the only document
valid to travel to Malvinas was the “white card”.
“Let’s hope she recalls that, and follows on her husband’s steps who
disavowed the Malvinas fisheries and hydrocarbons understandings with
the UK government; she must do the same with the 1999 agreement on
communications and have Aerolineas Argentinas take over from Lan Chile”.
No comments:
Post a Comment