In a PR
stunt the US fund NML-Capital offered to fly back free of charge all crew
members of the Argentine training frigate ARA Libertad retained in Ghana, but
reiterated that to release the vessel Argentina must deposit a 20million
dollars bail.
Flagship
of the Argentine navy with all its ceremonial sails displayed
According
to the Buenos Aires media in a letter from the solicitors’ office representing
NML Capital in Accra, Bentsi-Enchill, Letsa & Ankomah addressed to
Argentina’s legal defence Larry Otoo, it indicates that “our client has no
intention of causing inconveniences” to the crew members.
For this
reason, “even in the absence of a bail deposit, NML-Capital can, with immediate
effect, pay all costs so that sailors and cadets can fly back to their
respective countries”, says the letter signed by Ace Anan Ankomah.
The
letter with copy to all the main officers from the Ghana government dedicates several
paragraphs to try and display good will vis-à-vis Argentina’s international
moves to try and release the Navy vessel, an asset belonging to a sovereign
nation.
“We must
recall that in its 2 October ruling the Honourable Court, aware of the possible
consequences of its order, explicitly gave Argentina the chance to liberate the
frigate ARA Libertad” says the letter adding that NML Capital “does not oppose
the vessel abandoning Ghana as long as your client deposits a bail of 20
million dollars”
The figure
is reasonable since “it represents less than 5% of the full claim of our client
before the court” in the US together with Dart, the other fund involved in the
demand.
“We
regret we haven’t received any formal reply yet to our offer. Anyhow we have taking
note as it was indicated to the court on 9 October, that your client does not
seem willing to deposit a bail”, adds the letter.
However
“we still believe there is an opportunity for Argentina to deposit bail in
court and obtain the immediate release of the vessel”. Apparently the
solicitors in Ghana who were contracted by Argentina’s New York legal office
Cleary, Gottieb, Steen & Hamilton, had not replied to the NML letter.

No comments:
Post a Comment