The DDG-1000 Zumwalt.
An enormous, expensive and technology-laden warship that some navy leaders once tried to kill because of its cost is now viewed as an important part of the Obama Administration's Asia-Pacific strategy, with advanced capabilities that the navy's top officer says represent the navy's future.
The stealthy, guided missile-armed Zumwalt taking shape at Bath Iron Works is the biggest destroyer ever built for the United States Navy.
The low-to-the-water warship will feature a wave-piercing hull, composite deckhouse, electric drive propulsion, advanced sonar, missiles and powerful guns that fire rocket-propelled warheads as far as 160km.
It's longer and heavier than existing destroyers but will have half the crew because of automated systems.
"With its stealth, incredibly capable sonar system, strike capability and lower manning requirements, this is our future," concluded Admiral Jonathan Greenert, chief of naval operations, who gave the warship his endorsement on a visit last week to Bath Iron Works, where the ships are being built.
It wasn't always this way.
The General Accounting Office expressed concerns that the Navy was trying to incorporate too much new technology.
Some Navy officials pointed out that it's less capable than existing destroyers when it comes to missile defence, and a defence analyst warned that it would be vulnerable while operating close to shore for fire support.
Even its "tumblehome" hull was criticised as potentially unstable in certain situations.
The 182m-long ships are so big that the General Dynamics-owned shipyard spent US$40 million to construct a 32m-tall building to assemble the giant hull segments.
And then there's the cost, roughly US$3.8 billion ($4.6 billion) apiece, the Navy's proposed budget says.
Including research and development, the cost grows to US$7 billion apiece, said Winslow Wheeler, director of the Straus Military Reform Project at the Centre for Defence Information in Washington.
Because of the cost, the originally envisioned 32 ships dipped to 24 and then seven. Eventually, the programme was truncated to just three. The first, the Zumwalt, will be christened next year and delivered in 2014.
But Greenert said the ship fits perfectly into the new emphasis on bolstering the US military presence in the Pacific in response to Asia's growing economic importance and China's rise as a military power.
Greenert didn't go into detail on how the new ship could be used. But the Defence Department has expressed concerns that China is modernising its Navy with a near-term goal of stopping or delaying US intervention in a conflict involving Taiwan.
China considers the self-governing island a renegade province. Defence officials also see a potential flashpoint in the South China Sea, where China's territorial claims overlap with those of Vietnam, the Philippines and Malaysia.
The Zumwalt's new technology will allow the warship to deter and defeat aggression and to maintain operations in areas where an enemy seeks to deny access, both on the open ocean and in operations closer to shore, the Navy says.
Jay Korman, industry analyst with The Avascent Group, said the warship uses so much new technology that it's viewed by the Navy as a "silver bullet" answer to threats. The only problem is the cost.
"They were looking to introduce so many new technologies at once, and the cost ballooned," he said. "I don't think people have changed their minds that it's a capable ship. It's just too expensive."
The Zumwalt's 155mm deck guns were built to pound the shore with guided projectiles to pave the way for the Marines to arrive in landing craft, and they're far more cost-effective in certain situations than cruise missiles, said Eric Wertheim, author of the Naval Institute's Guide to Combat Fleets of the World.
The smaller crew also represents a substantial cost saving, he added.
The ship could one day be equipped with an electromagnetic railgun, a powerful weapon that fires a projectile at several times the speed of sound.
No comments:
Post a Comment