The third phase of explosive
ordnance and landmine clearance in the Falkland Islands
is scheduled to begin next January and extend until March 2013 and is
programmed to concentrate in the surrounding of the capital Stanley.
The Zimbabwe
team celebrates previous successful clearances of areas that included Surf
Bay, Goose Green, Sapper Hill and
part of Stanley Common
These are the remnants of the Argentine occupation of the Falklands thirty
years ago, back in 1982, which left thousands of mostly antipersonnel mines
planted in areas considered strategic from a military point of view to defend
the capital Stanley, but with which Islanders have had to learn to live for
over three decades.
This next phase of the Foreign
and Commonwealth Office Explosive Ordnance and Landmine Clearance Programme is
to be carried by BACTEC International Limited, who undertook the first two
phases.
This is the third such phase of
explosive ordnance and landmine clearance in the Falkland Islands.
The first was carried out in 2010 with the successful clearance of areas that
included Surf Bay,
Goose Green and Sapper Hill, as well as land clearance on Stanley Common in
2012 that opened up a large area including the Stone Corral.
The scope of work for Phase Three
is the clearance of one known, fenced, minefield in the part of Stanley Common
that was released for public use earlier this year, as well as the clearance of
the large (currently restricted) area just to the north and west of Mile Pond,
which, it is suspected, contains two minefields.
Additionally, a further minefield
just to the north of and bordering the Stanley
to Goose Green Road, which
was subjected to some clearance in 1982, is to be re-processed/cleared and the
land released for public use.
Any available time will be used
to carry out further land release to the east of Round Pond heading towards the
Eliza Cove Road.
The BACTEC team will consist of
51 Zimbabwean demining personnel, most of who have already worked on Phases One
and Two.
Phillimon Gonamombe will again be
the Operations Manager and the project will be directed by Guy Lucas, who in
1982 set up the post conflict clearance and also directed the 2009/10 and 2012
programmes.
Guy has firsthand experience and
knowledge of the Islands and the task at hand. Unlike
the 2012 program, which focussed on land release, the 2013 program will focus
on clearing known minefields to meet the UK Government commitment in accordance
with the Ottawa Treaty, as well as doing some land release.
The BACTEC team is looking
forward to returning in January to continue its work following up on 2012’s
successful land release project.
BACTEC are pleased that Guy
Marot, who was part of the team for Phase 1 in 2009/10, will be the Falkland
Islands Demining Project Office (FIDPO) representative. (PN).
The recent massive naval mine clearing exercise in the mouth
of the Persian Gulf (the Straits of Hormuz) demonstrated
two things. First, mine clearing ships (which many nations have) and mine
clearing helicopters (like the U.S.
MH-53) were not as successful as hoped. A lot of the practice mines used were
not found. Second, one new system, the SeaFox (a remotely controlled underwater
system) was very successful. Ten nations already have SeaFox, and while the United
States is a new user, it is hustling to make
SeaFox work from different ships and aircraft. This involves training
ship crews to operate SeaFox and equipping ships with the control equipment.
Earlier this year the U.S. Navy ordered several dozen more
of the expendable SeaFox UUVs (unmanned underwater vehicles). SeaFox was designed
to find and destroy bottom mines (which sit on the seabed) as well as those
that float. These UUVs were quickly sent to the Persian Gulf
to deal with potential Iranian use of naval mines. The U.S.
first used their new Seafox UUVs on some of the eight U.S. Avenger class mine
hunting ships stationed in the Persian Gulf.
SeaFox is a small (1.4x.4x.2 meters/55x16x8 inches) battery
powered sub that weighs 43 kg (95 pounds) and has a fiber-optic cable
connecting it to a surface ship or hovering helicopter. The controller can move
the SeaFox close to a suspected mine (using a small sonar unit to assist
navigation), then turn on a spotlight for a video cam to examine the object and
determine if it is a mine. If it is then SeaFox gets closer and detonates a shaped
charge explosive, sending a shaft of hot plasma through the mine destroying it
(and the SeaFox).
SeaFox has an endurance of about 100 minutes, a top speed of
10 kilometers an hour, and can dive as deep as 300 meters (930 feet). Operators
get to increase their skills and effectiveness using a SeaFox simulator.
On board
the USS Ponce, the command ship for mine hunting operations in the Persian
Gulf, sailors practice using surveillance equipment. Watch this video to see
the unmanned aerial vehicle called Scan Eagle land by snagging a cable with its
wing. The camera in the aircraft feeds back video to sailors who watch for
threatening boats.
A major
international naval exercise last month in and around the Persian Gulf and
Arabian Sea, led by the U.S. Navy with more than 30 other nations
participating, located fewer than half of the practice mines laid at sea.
This
outcome of the highly publicized military drills — not publicly known until now
— underscores how difficult it may be for the United States and its partners to
detect and incapacitate waterborne explosive devices that Iran has threatened
to plant if its nuclear facilities come under attack.
Out of
the 29 simulated mines that were dropped in the water, “I don’t think a great
many were found,” retired Navy Capt. Robert O’Donnell, a former mine warfare
director for his service, told the NewsHour. “It was probably around half or
less.”
Navy
officials, though, said the drill was constructive and asserted that focusing
on the number of mines detected alone would paint an incomplete picture.
“We
enjoyed great success,” said Cdr. Jason Salata, the top public affairs officer
for the 5th Fleet. “Every platform that was sent to find a shape found a shape.
We stand by that.” Salata asserted that “there were no missed mines, each
platform that had an opportunity to find the mine did so.”
The
drill, dubbed International Mine Countermeasures Exercise 2012 or IMCMEX,
brought together countries from all over the world at a time when tensions with
Iran have been heating up. Tehran has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz,
one of the world’s most important choke points through which 20 percent of the
world’s oil flows.
The
surprising mine-detection result came in what one senior Navy official told the
NewsHour was “one of the most significant and strategically important exercises
of the year.” It was also the largest exercise of its kind ever held in the
region.
Being
able to find and destroy sea mines is critical to maintaining stable world oil
prices and global economic growth.
“The
Strait [of Hormuz] remains a vital sea lane of communications to us and our
partners,” Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said earlier this year. “We are
determined to preserve freedom of transit there in the face of Iranian threats
to impose a blockade.”
“I just
felt that they should have done better,” said O’Donnell, clearly disappointed
with the outcome of this key measure of performance. “That’s the point of the
exercise, to do mine-countermine [operations] in an area, and to find the
mines.”
Now a
consultant, O’Donnell was invited by the Navy to observe the September exercise
firsthand as it unfolded.
The Navy
declined to provide data on how many practice mines were located during the
two-week naval drill but did not dispute that less than half were found.
However, a spokesman insisted that the figures do not tell the whole story and
that the event was “‘not just about finding” the dummy mines.
“Numbers
alone do not tell the story of IMCMEX’s effectiveness and success,” said Lt.
Greg Raelson, a media officer with the 5th fleet, stationed in Bahrain. “We
operated ships, helicopters, divers, and unmanned undersea vehicles with
accuracy and effectiveness, confirming our ability to respond to maritime mine
threats in the undersea environment. Because of this exercise, we were able to
enhance partnerships and further hone the international community’s ability to
ensure the safe and free flow of navigation.”
However,
some analysts with extensive experience in evaluating Navy mine exercises say
the rate of success in detecting practice mines is critically important.
“I would
be surprised if the post-exercise analysis didn’t include some kind of a
scoring mechanism of how well did we do against this set” of imitation mines,
said Scott Savitz, a senior RAND engineer who, in a prior job, led
Navy-contracted teams to analyze counter-mine exercises. The central point of a
mine-hunting exercise is “to find them all, because in the real-world scenario
you want to minimize the subsequent mine risk,” he said.
“You
want to try to ascertain how well you are doing. You need a find a certain
number of mines and a certain number of attempts to hunt or sweep them in order
to get anything statistically meaningful,” Savitz said. “If we get zero or one
or two, it doesn’t tell us much. It’s not granular enough.”
During
the exercise, the military’s top commander of U.S. Naval forces in the Middle
East stressed two key objectives for the drill: To practice working together
with other countries, and to find simulated mines.
“This
exercise is about getting the mines of out the water, and making sure people
can sail through the Strait of Hormuz,” Vice Adm. John Miller, the commander of
the U.S. Navy’s 5th Fleet, told reporters in Bahrain as the exercise was
getting under way. “And what it’s really about is the opportunity to operate
together in an international coalition and to make sure we can complete all the
tasks that need to be completed.”
The top
U.S. combatant commander for the region last month said the exercise was
intended to realistically simulate possible military scenarios.
“We
train as you do the real thing,” said Gen. James Mattis, the commander of U.S.
military forces in the Middle East said while onboard a command-and-control
vessel, USS Ponce, during the exercise. “You’ve got to train the same way that
you operate every day at sea.”
One of
the Navy spokesmen asserted last week that the military did not intend to go
after all the mock mines laid for the exercise, much as an individual might
focus a session at the gym on selected pieces of equipment but skip those that
are unnecessary.
“My
trainer builds me a workout,” said Salata. “Perhaps my trainer does not want me
to work on some of the equipment. Maybe I don’t have enough time to get to all
of the equipment. But based on my expectations, and the objectives of the
session, I still may have an amazing workout and enjoy great success.”
Likewise,
in terms of last month’s exercise, he said, “the number of shapes found vs. the
number of shapes laid does not tell a clear story.”
Savitz,
the RAND engineer, said a selective approach to testing counter-mine readiness
might indeed have been appropriate for last month’s drill.
“If the
goal is to do some of the monkey bars and then…we have something else that is
in a slightly different environment and we are going to be testing your skills
in that,” he said, the exercise approach might have given participating nations
“a broad sampling of all of the parts of the decathlon” and “that may make
sense.”
Navy
spokesmen said that following the exercise, a key measure of achievement would
be to see how many countries partake in the next drill.
“So how
do we see success in this case? Well, the biggest tell will be the
participation interest for next year’s exercise, which is already being
planned,” Raelson said.
But
others see coalition-building as just one piece of a fruitful military
exercise.
Former
Navy Lt. Cdr. Stephen Burke, who served aboard ships in the Persian Gulf when
it was infested with mines during the U.S. war with Iraq in 1990-1991, said 5th
Fleet officials are “putting the spin on it” when they emphasize the 30-nation
participation without detailing how well those countries did at finding mines.
When the
U.S. Navy is “trying to get people to participate, you don’t get them to
participate by telling them that they don’t do very well,” Burke said. “It was
a big love-in exercise to get them to keep coming back and to build a
coalition.”
Mine-hunting
is quite challenging, he emphasized.
The
less-than-50-percent success rate in the exercise shows “it’s very difficult to
detect shapes on the seabed and discriminate between rocks and other debris
from the actual mines you are actually trying to go after,” Burke said. Well
aware of the tall order involved, the Navy likely laid “10 shapes in order for
the probability of finding at least one of them,” he surmised.
Meantime,
U.S. naval forces are trying to build a wide coalition of foreign navies to
show resolve in confronting Iran, he said.
“They
are trying to get everyone — especially the partner nations that may not have a
robust capability — to come away from the exercise feeling good about
themselves for having accomplished something positive,” Burke said. “So it’s
like seeding a lake for fishing. You put more fish in there than you expect
your customers to catch, but you want them to all go away having caught a
fish.”
That
said, setting an objective of maximizing international partner participation
“in and of itself is not bad,” Burke said, given a perceived political need to
signal to Iran that the international community is determined to keep the
Strait of Hormuz open.
Raelson,
the 5th Fleet media officer, emphasized the collaborative military successes
involved.
“Each
ship, unmanned underwater vehicle and helicopter that was tasked with finding a
practice mine in a particular geographic operating area did. The use of shapes
enabled participants to use their individual capabilities in their three
regional environments while proving interoperability, compatibility and
information exchange,” he said. “It was not the intention to utilize the
inaugural IMCMEX to validate effectiveness by assessing individual nations’
capabilities and nor would it be appropriate for us to comment too deeply on
tactical performance.”
O’Donnell
said the exercise appears to have been useful, but the United States and its
military partners should look to future counter-mine drills to more fully prepare
for real-world threats.
“All in
all, I guess that the exercise was a success since so many nations participated
and they were able to communicate with each other,” said the retired Navy
captain. “Next time, though, I think they should do a better job of finding the
drill mines that were there.”
U.S. diplomats have been silent on these growing alliances. However, fresh revelations about Chávez’s alliance with Iran demonstrate what he is capable of doing when he is not provoked.
Hugo Chávez admitted on June 13 that Venezuela is manufacturing Iranian drones and that Iran has built several explosives and chemical facilities in his country. However, Chávez is trying to throw international observers off his scent by acknowledging an unmanned aerial vehicle program for “peaceful purposes.” What he did not disclose are the many other troubling aspects of the extensive military cooperation between the two rabidly anti-U.S. regimes—not the least of which is that Venezuela secretly shipped an F-16 to Iran in 2006 that could be used today to test the air defenses around Teheran’s illicit nuclear facilities.
U.S. diplomats have convinced themselves—and have tried to convince members of Congress and the media—that Iran’s push into the Americas poses no threat to U.S. security. Indeed, a State Department spokesperson quickly downplayed the significance of Chávez’s admission.
Here’s some of what U.S. diplomats continue to ignore:
The fact that Venezuela shipped one of its U.S.-manufactured F-16 fighter aircraft to Iran was revealed to me last month by a Venezuelan military officer who was present during an Iranian military delegation’s visit to El Libertador Air Base in Palo Negro. Because the Israeli air force operates modified F-16s, the Iranian military could use the purloined Venezuelan aircraft to calibrate its air defense systems.
Venezuela secretly shipped an F-16 to Iran in 2006 that could be used today to perfect the air defenses around Teheran’s illicit nuclear facilities.
Chávez also failed to reveal that Iran is bankrolling the production of marine (seaborne) mines that might one day be deployed in the Strait of Hormuz or across shipping lanes leading to the Panama Canal. According to another Venezuelan military source, the director of that mine program purchased some of the necessary technology here in the United States.
Neither did the Venezuelan caudillo explain why six Iranian companies associated with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and sanctioned by the United Nations, United Kingdom, and European Union for their involvement in Tehran’s illicit ballistic missile and nuclear programs are now operating major industrial facilities at strategic locations in Venezuela. For example, the firm Kimia Sanat, which is helping Venezuela build unmanned aerial vehicles near Maracay, Venezuela, was sanctioned under a 2007 UN Security Council resolution.
Parchin Chemical Industries, sanctioned under a UN resolution in 2007 for exporting chemicals used for Iran’s ballistic missile program, has recently completed a factory near Morón, Venezuela, to produce “ball powder,” an explosive propellant. Likewise, Iran’s National Petrochemical Company was sanctioned by the United Kingdom in 2008 but continues to operate a “petrochemical training facility” in Venezuela, which was inaugurated personally by Chávez and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2006.
The Iranian Offshore Engineering Construction Company, which has operated a private port and shipyard on the strategic Paraguana peninsula since 2008, was sanctioned last year for being involved in the construction of the Fordow uranium enrichment site near Qom.
Chávez failed to reveal that Iran is bankrolling the production of marine (seaborne) mines that might one day be deployed in the Strait of Hormuz or across shipping lanes leading to the Panama Canal.
According to reliable sources in the Venezuelan government, Iranian Major General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the Revolutionary Guard Corps aerospace commander who previously headed Iran’s missile program, visited the facilities in Maracay and Moran in July 2009 and November 2011. An independent source who infiltrated Hezbollah on behalf of a South American security agency attended several lectures from 2006 to 2008 at the Iranian-run petrochemical training facility by radical cleric Mohsen Rabbani, who is wanted by Interpol for his role in the 1992 and 1994 terrorist bombings against the Israeli Embassy and Jewish community center in Buenos Aires.
Chávez is suffering from terminal cancer and may die before Venezuela’s October 7 presidential elections. In the meantime, members of his ruthless inner circle—many of whom are implicated in narcotrafficking and corruption—are determined to hold on to power at all costs. The Venezuelan opposition is waging a lonely battle against an authoritarian regime that is managed by Cuba, bankrolled by China, and armed by Russia and Iran.
U.S. diplomats have been silent on these growing alliances, determined to avoid a public confrontation with Chávez for fear of provoking the bombastic populist. However, these fresh revelations about Chávez’s alliance with Iran demonstrate what he is capable of doing when he is not provoked.
With Iran’s back against the wall, squeezed by new international economic sanctions, it will scratch and claw to hold on to its economic ties to Venezuela, which it uses to gain illicit access to the international financial system and carry its struggle to the United States’ doorstep. As the United States and the international community square off with Iran in the months ahead, we may pay a dear price for having neglected Chávez’s dangerous liaisons with Tehran until it was too late.
Roger F. Noriega held senior positions in the State Department in the administration of President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2005 and is a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. His firm Vision Americas represents U.S. and foreign clients.
Hydroid has announced that the Japanese Ministry of Defence (MOD) has purchased one Remus 600 system for mine countermeasure operations. The new purchase brings the Japanese MOD AUV fleet to five vehicles, the company said in a 12 June, 2012 statement.
The Remus 600 AUV was specifically designed for operations requiring extended endurance, increased payload capacity and greater operating depth.
Earlier this year the Japanese MOD purchased four Remus 100 systems for investigating and mapping seafloor dispersion of contaminants as well as mine countermeasure operations. Mine detection work includes locating explosive devices and other undetonated ordnances as well as finding and classifying submerged objects.
Hydroid's Remus AUVs are modular, and can be fitted with a variety of sensors and used to aid in hydrographic surveys, harbor security operations, debris field mapping, scientific sampling and mapping, as well as many basic and applied research programmes.