History
buffs say the famous runway at Pearl Harbor's Ford Island is under attack once
again -- this time from the U.S. Navy itself, which may cover it with solar
panels.
The
unused runway in the center of the military base at Pearl Harbor is a good
location for the solar project and is "critically important to achieving
renewable energy mandates," says Navy spokeswoman Agnes Tauyan. But
American history aficionados say the site should be preserved as sacred ground.
"We
totally agree with (the Navy) being green, but we don't think they should do it
where Americans spilled their red blood," says Ken DeHoff, director of the
Pacific Aviation Museum, located in an airplane hangar on Ford Island.
"There's plenty of room for them to create this project off to the west,
which is just scrub oak and abandoned land."
The
runway is part of a decommissioned airfield now, but on Dec. 7, 1941, 33 of the
70 aircraft on the ground at Ford Island and one hangar were destroyed during
the Japanese surprise attack. In 1964, the runway and the rest of Ford Island
was designated a National Historic Landmark.
The
Navy's plan that is under consideration would cover Ford Island's 4,000-foot
runway and 14 acres of adjoining land with 60,000 solar-energy panels. The goal
is to convert at least 50% of the Navy's energy demands to alternative sources
by 2020.
The
Pacific Aviation Museum has opposed the proposed project because it says it
does not respect the runway's significance in American history.
"Consider
the hue and cry should a 60,000-panel project be located at Gettysburg or
Valley Forge," the museum said in a written statement. DeHoff says the
museum suggested the Navy build the solar panel array at West Loch, an unused
area to the west of the airfield on Waipio Peninsula, but he says the Navy
rejected the alternative location because it was within the "blast
arc," or minimum safe distance, of an area where the Navy stores ammunition.
The museum
gives tours of the island, featuring the runway, hangars and iconic
red-and-white spiraled control tower that was featured prominently in the
movies Pearl Harbor and Tora! Tora! Tora!
The
island is also home to the battleship USS Missouri as well as monuments to the
battleships USS Utah and USS Oklahoma. Tauyan says the proposal is part of a
project that "includes installation of PV arrays on roofs, parking shade
structures and available parcels of land" in military installations across
the state of Hawaii, and that the project is critically important to
"achieving energy security."
According
to the Navy, the runway at Ford Island is under consideration for the panels
because "it is an inactive space that is ideally located and sized."
The Navy says the photovoltaic panel systems will be built, owned, operated and
maintained by three energy companies awarded a $500 million contract to provide
locally generated energy to the Navy.
The Navy
says the West Loch location has not yet been completely ruled out and that
several potential locations are being considered while the Navy conducts an
environmental assessment of the surrounding area.
DeHoff
says that although the runway hasn't been maintained since its deactivation in
1999, the site's historical significance, along with its importance to the
local community, hasn't diminished. "This is an area that the kids play
in, and they're going to cover it up and put a 7-foot high fence around it and
basically make the place a monstrosity," he says.
Along
with the roughly 450 homes housing Navy personnel and their families on the
island, DeHoff says the museum has about 200,000 visitors a year.
According
to the Pacific Aviation Museum, the Navy 's initial proposal was to erect the
60,000 blue, 4-by-6-foot solar panels in a way that would resemble the historic
runway when seen from the air, with a white X placed every 1,000 feet along the
array as if it were a closed runway.
Barbara
Bloom, a museum representative, says the Navy's design is unacceptable because
"it's going to look like the runway's made of Legos."
Tauyan
says the Navy "remains committed to balancing our responsibility towards
environmental stewardship, energy security and the preservation of historically
significant facilities and structures."