Showing posts with label Royal Canadian Navy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Royal Canadian Navy. Show all posts

Saturday, 1 March 2014

HMCS Protecteur Stranded in Mid-Pacific After Fire

A fire in the engine room of the Canadian warship HMCS Protecteur has left the vessel stranded in the mid-Pacific in heavy seas, according to Commodore Bob Auchterlonie, the commander of the navy's Pacific fleet.
Local media reports that the fire broke out Thursday around 10:20 p.m. PT as the Protecteur was returning from operational duties with nearly 300 on board.

Auchterlonie called the fire significant as the crew battled it over a significant period of time to save the ship. The fire has damaged propulsion equipment, and several people suffered minor injuries.

The vessel had to stop about 630 kilometres northeast of Pearl Harbor, Hawaii and the American destroyer USS Michael Murphy and another ship have been sent to assist.

The Protecteur is one of two auxiliary oil replenishment ships in the Canadian navy, both launched in 1969. The cause of the blaze has not yet been confirmed. 
 
Follow HMCS Protecteur

Thursday, 30 May 2013

Canadian Navy announces designs for new ships, says the military has placed its future in industry’s hands

The head of the Royal Canadian Navy delivered a poignant reminder Wednesday that the fate of Canada’s military is in industry’s hands as he announced that a design for new resupply ships has been chosen.

The relationship between National Defence and defence companies has been turbulent recently following problems with a number of high-profile procurement projects, including the F-35 stealth fighter, armoured vehicles for the army and search-and-rescue aircraft.

Some of these issues have originated within National Defence and other federal departments, others have been industry’s fault. The result, however, has been the same: delays, cost overruns, and project cancellations or resets.
 Vice-Admiral Paul Maddison said "The Royal Canadian Navy has placed its future in a very real way into your hands."
Speaking to a room full of defence company representatives during a major arms-trade show in Ottawa, Vice-Admiral Paul Maddison noted that the huge opportunity inherent in the Conservative government’s promise to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in Canadian military equipment over the next two decades.

“If we are to collectively succeed, it will be because we enter into this great enterprise in a genuine spirit of strategic trust and co-operation, of frank and honest dialogue and respect,” he said.

Maddison appealed to industry representatives to look beyond their own interests and do the right thing for the country and Canada’s men and women in uniform.

“The Royal Canadian Navy has placed its future in a very real way into your hands,” he said. “The same applies to the Canadian Armed Forces as a whole.”

“We have done so with great optimism and confidence in your ingenuity, your creativity, and your shared determination to succeed. We’ve done so knowing that you have that sense of mission and purpose, which surpasses the fates and fortunes of the firms that employ you.”

He said this is particularly true for the government’s $35-billion national shipbuilding plan, which is emerging as one of the most complex military procurements in Canadian military history.

Maddison, who retires in just over three weeks, said the three major naval projects — new armed Arctic patrol ships; replacements for the navy’s aging destroyers and frigates; and new resupply vessels — are proceeding.

In particular, he revealed that a design had been chosen for the resupply vessels, also called joint support ships, in late April following an in-depth comparison between two options “based on capability, cost and risk.”

The joint support ships were the subject of a Parliamentary Budget Officer’s report at the end of February, which warned the project could cost more than $1 billion more than the government had budgeted. The government refuted the PBO’s findings.

Maddison would not reveal what design had been selected for the vessels, nor could he say when the joint support ships will be built thanks to a scheduling conflict with the Coast Guard’s new polar icebreaker, the CCGS John G. Diefenbaker.

The joint support ships are desperately needed to replace the navy’s two 45-year-old resupply vessels, which were supposed to have been retired in 2012 and have become environmentally unsound and prohibitively expensive to maintain.

But they are expected to be ready for construction at the same time in 2017 as the Canadian Coast Guard’s new polar-class icebreaker, the CCGS John G. Diefenbaker, and the Vancouver shipyard responsible for both projects can only handle one project at a time.

Maddison said there is an “urgent” need to replace both the resupply ships and Coast Guard’s existing heavy icebreaker, the 40-year-old CCGS Louis St-Laurent.

“So the sequencing decision that’s going to be made is, you know, is JSS built first or is the polar (icebreaker) built first,” he said. “So we’ll see how that goes.”

The navy commander could not say whether the navy would still be able to afford the new joint support ship design that had been chosen if construction was delayed in favour of the icebreaker.

He also warned that he did not see the navy’s existing resupply vessels lasting past the end of this decade, though he was confident National Defence would be able to “find a way to innovatively mitigate any capability gap that opens.”

Saturday, 11 May 2013

CMF Warship Makes Second Drugs Bust in Six Weeks

A warship attached to the Combined Maritime Forces (CMF) has made its second major drugs bust in six weeks, seizing over 300kgs of heroin.

The Canadian frigate HMCS Toronto intercepted a suspect dhow 118 miles of the coast of Tanzania, having tracked her for several days before finally swooping in to make the boarding.

Once on board, Toronto’s crew discovered the drugs hidden underneath a fake rail in the dhow’s stern. After an extensive search,  a total of 317kgs of processed heroin was recovered, along with a small amount of hashish. All the seized drugs have been destroyed.
The success marks Toronto’s second major haul since her deployment to the Middle East began earlier this year, coming hot on the heels of a seizure of 500kgs of heroin from a similar vessel on 29 March.

Toronto’s Commanding Officer, Commander Jeff Hamilton, said: “The success of this operation marks another significant maritime interception of narcotics in the Combined Maritime Forces area of operations.

“Our operations are making a difference to help keep drugs off the streets and out of the hands of criminals.”

Operating under the direction of the French-led Combined Task Force (CTF) 150, Toronto has been patrolling the waters of the Indian Ocean, Gulf of Aden and Red Sea promoting maritime security and stability in the region.

 Captain Jean-Michel Martinet, Commander of CTF 150, said: “This important seizure of drugs, represents another step toward ensuring a secure maritime environment for legitimate mariners in the region and Toronto can be very proud of her achievement.

“It has been a very productive couple of months for CTF 150.  We have shown, and Toronto has shown, thanks to their professionalism and pugnacity, that millions of square miles of ocean are not the property and playground of the smugglers and terrorists.”

CTF150 forms part of the multinational CMF, which draws together assets and expertise from 28 nationsto coordinate maritime security operations across the Middle East.

The CMF mission is to promote security, stability and prosperity across the Arabian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman, the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean. The area encompasses approximately 2.5million square miles of international waters, including some of the world’s most important shipping lanes.

The smuggling of narcotics in the Northern Indian Ocean and surrounding region is a recognised funding source for terrorist organisations. By interrupting the narcotics trade CTF150 is able to deny financial resources to extremist groups.

Commodore Simon Ancona, Royal Navy, Deputy Commander of CMF, said: “To make a second haul of this magnitude is an impressive achievement, and my wholehearted congratulations go out to HMCS Toronto, her crew, and CTF 150.

“Disruptions and seizures like this strike a powerful blow against those who would use the high seas for unlawful purposes, and are the result of multiple nations pulling together to stop illegal activity in the waters of the Middle East.”

Saturday, 27 April 2013

Canadian sailors opened fire in Jamaican waters, broke international law during war on drugs mission

Bad maps are being blamed after Canadian naval reservists participating in the U.S.-led war on drugs last year sparked a diplomatic flap by firing their weapons and intercepting fishing trawlers in Jamaican waters — without Jamaica’s permission.

The embarrassing incident, which has never before been publicly reported, broke international maritime law — not the first time legal questions have been raised about Canada’s increasing involvement in the drug war.

On March 27, 2012, HMCS Goose Bay and Kingston were patrolling south of Jamaica as part of Operation Caribbe, Canada’s contribution to an ongoing, U.S.-led anti-drug trafficking mission in the Caribbean and East Pacific.

Documents obtained by Postmedia News show that at one point, crew members on both vessels began firing their ships’ weapons, including large 50-calibre machine guns, as part of a live-fire training exercise.

The Goose Bay also deployed its small rigid-hulled inflatable boat on two occasions that day to intercept and identify 17 small fishing vessels to ensure they weren’t carrying cocaine, marijuana or were involved in any other illicit activity.

The Goose Bay and Kingston also reportedly pulled up alongside one vessel that Jamaican officials said had a “retired senior political figure on board.”

The Goose Bay and Kingston are Kingston-class maritime coastal defence vessels that are much smaller than the navy’s frigates and destroyers, crewed almost entirely by reservists, and generally used for patrolling Canada’s coasts.

It was only the next day, when the head of the Jamaican coast guard contacted Canadian authorities to complain, that defence officials realized the Goose Bay and Kingston had been in Jamaican territory and not international waters.

“HMCS Goose Bay and Kingston inadvertently conducted live weapons training and other maritime operations in Jamaican territorial waters,” the document reads, “in contravention of international maritime law.”

The mistake was quickly attributed to the Canadian vessels’ maps.

“This was an oversight,” according to the documents’ talking points prepared in case media got wind of the story. “The ships were operating with navigation charts that did not accurately reflect the territorial waters of Jamaica. Consequently, the ships’ captains thought they were in international waters when they conducted the exercises.”

The notes go on to say that the Canadian Forces had “amended their navigational charts to accurately reflect Jamaica’s claimed territorial waters, and future deployments of ships and aircraft to the region will ensure the correct charts are used to ensure that nothing similar happens in the future.”
There was no explanation as to why the ships had the incorrect maps.

Canadian military vessels and aircraft aren’t strangers to the Caribbean, particularly since the Conservative government first launched Canada’s involvement in U.S.-led anti-drug trafficking efforts in 2006.

Canada’s involvement there and throughout much of the Western hemisphere has grown substantially over the intervening years, with Canadian surveillance aircraft, naval vessels and even submarines an increasingly common sight during interdiction missions.

Documents obtained by Postmedia News indicate much of this “larger, more robust contribution” to the U.S.-led war on drugs has been driven by the military itself, which has seen the mission as a key opportunity in the aftermath of Afghanistan.

National Defence reports that the total cost of Operation Caribbe has increased from $25.3 million in 2008-09 to an estimated $282.2 million this year, reflecting that increased involvement as more military assets are dedicated to the mission.

(Officially, National Defence says the actual cost of participating in Operation Caribbe was $7.4 million in 2008-09 and $9.6 million this year because the rest of the costs would have been incurred whether the mission was undertaken or not.)

This expanded role, which has gone largely unreported, has included some prickly legal questions beyond the actions of the HMCS Goose Bay and Kingston.

In 2010, for example, the Conservative government agreed to let armed U.S. Coast Guard boarding teams ride in Canadian military vessels despite what was described in internal notes as “the unique nature of this arrangement and complex legal issues.”

More recent briefing notes have indicated an interest in having Canadian authorities actually boarding vessels suspected of illicit activities and making arrests, which would raise other legal questions.

A federal government program designed to send military-grade tactical gear to Latin America, including boots, pistol holsters and boats, to help battle organized crime groups was scrapped last month after questions about its legality were raised.

The Defence Department briefing documents estimate that transnational criminal organizations in the region are worth more than $40 billion US, with cocaine being their main source of income.

The organized crime groups are a “corrosive” threat to governments and populations throughout the Americas, particularly in Central American countries such as Honduras, Guatemala and Panama, the documents add.

Canada’s involvement in tackling this threat started in 2006 with the deployment of a maritime patrol aircraft to the region after the U.S. military diverted half of its surveillance planes to the Middle East and the Dutch retired its fleet of patrol aircraft.

The Conservative government has made the Western hemisphere one of Canada’s foreign policy priorities.

HMCS Victoria (SSK 876) at Canada Place


Tuesday, 16 April 2013

Submarines ready to enter Royal Canadian Navy fleet



Run silent, run deep.

In a matter of weeks the Royal Canadian Navy will have three submarines ready to do just that.

The fourth will be in dry dock and not released until 2015.

These conventional diesel-electric boats were all purchased second hand from Britain in 1998 and transferred to the RCN at an initial cost of $750 million.

Years of controversy and refit followed before last year’s historic visit by HMCS Victoria to the RIMPAC exercises off Hawaii. That passage culminated in its firing an MK 48 heavyweight torpedo and sinking the decommissioned transport USNS Concord.

News that HMCS Victoria is to be joined by its sisters is welcome for the defence establishment. For critics — of which there are many — it is just another chapter in a convoluted tale of mismatched procurement meeting ill-defined strategic needs.
The Canadian taxpayer has been left to pick up the now estimated $3 billion (and rising) tab prompting the question: does the RCN even need to stay in the submarine business?

It’s in good company if it does.

Across the Pacific Rim, alone, countries as far apart as South Korea and Australia, Indonesia and Japan, China, Vietnam, Malaysia and Singapore operate conventional submarines.

Further afield Bangladesh is acquiring its first submarines to boost its naval power in the Bay of Bengal while India operates 14 boats, including a nuclear-powered attack submarine leased from Russia.

All are used for sea-lane security in a variety of scenarios including clandestine work delivering special forces operators in shallow coastal waters.

Still, those tasks should be viewed through an entirely different geo/strategic setting to that of Canada’s, cautions Steven Staples, president of the Rideau Institute, a defence and foreign policy think-tank in Ottawa.

He acknowledges the growing submarine capabilities in other parts of the globe but maintains Canada is historically not in the trade of long-range power projection.
“We live in a self-evidently different neighbourhood to Asia,” Staples said, “and our submarines are more coastal. They were designed to sit on the sea floor during the Cold War to watch and listen for Soviet fleet activity.

“There is a strong argument against whether we need them at all. The three Oberon class boats that preceded the current subs were mostly used to provide opposition training for the U.S. Navy.

“We may well find the new boats doing that as well. That’s a pretty expensive way to stay friends with an ally.”

Sitting, watching and listening. Three things non-nuclear submarines excel at.
Surely with increased shipping activity in the Arctic thanks to receding pack ice and more and bigger ships transiting the route for a short-cut to Europe, doesn’t it make sense for Canada to have eyes and ears monitoring a potentially ice free Northwest Passage?

“Well, it would help if they were ever fully operational, put it that way” Staples said. “If they could dive without hitting the ocean floor or even remember to close hatches before submerging.

“Look, I just don’t think this project has been worth the money and the time spent to deliver a marginal capability. I wouldn’t call it a textbook case of how Canada should NOT go about procuring extremely complicated defence equipment because, sadly, there are other contenders for that title.”

If Canada eventually embraces the “use ‘em if you’ve got ‘em” doctrine, they might want to look at what Australia did with its six Oberon-class diesel-electric boats during the last decades of the Cold War.

The Royal Australian Navy conducted perilous intelligence-gathering operations off the coasts of Vietnam, Indonesia, China and India as part of an American-led effort to check the Soviet Navy’s formidable fleet.

Between 1978 and 1992 Australian submarines would secretly track Soviet ships as they transited the South China Sea.

There were 16 patrols in all.

In one case an Australian boat famously trailed a new Soviet frigate all the way to the entrance of Vietnam’s Cam Ranh Bay naval base and photographed its hull shape, propellers, weapons systems and sonar. All undetected despite being just being 1.8-metres from the frigate’s hull at one stage.

Difficult but not impossible to replicate in Arctic waters if RCN submariners ever get the call to covertly see just who is using the trans-polar shipping route. And why.

Monday, 19 November 2012

Cold War sub leaves Hamilton on last journey - HMCS Ojibwa was towed out of Hamilton at 3:30 a.m. Sunday



A half-century-old submarine left Hamilton for its final journey early Sunday.
 HMCS Ojibwa had been docked at Heddle Marine at Pier 14 since early November. It left the Port of Hamilton at 3:30 a.m. Sunday.

The antique sub was getting a makeover before heading to a new naval museum in Port Burwell, Ont.
The Ojibwa is the last of Canada's Oberon-class submarines and a relic from the Cold War, when the West and the Soviet Union were each other's greatest adversaries.

“It was commissioned in 1965, built to be one of the quietest submarines in the world,” said Ret. Rear-Admiral Dan McNeil, co-ordinator of Project Ojibwa — the team that orchestrated the endeavour.

“Canada had obligations in the international community and the main one was to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Our job was to help keep the sea lines of communication open in the event of the Cold War breaking into any kind of hot war.”

To commemorate this role, the Ojibwa, which was donated by the Department of National Defence, will become the centrepiece of the new Elgin Military Museum of Naval History, set to open in 2013.
The sub is expected to arrive in Port Burwell on Monday or Tuesday, weather permitting. Port Burwell is located about 140 km southwest of Hamilton on the north shore of Lake Erie.

Visitors will be able to go on guided tours of the sub in the new museum.

“The story will be told about the submariners, the people who have served Canada, particularly under the waters of the North Atlantic,” McNeil said.

The most challenging part of this journey is towing the sub through the Welland Canal, the 43-kilometre man-made waterway that connects lakes Ontario and Erie, said John Ham, a project co-ordinator with Mammoet, a transportation firm helping to engineer the feat.

Mercifully, this final jaunt is much shorter than the one that brought the Ojibwa to Hamilton. In the spring, it was hauled from its previous home in Halifax via the St. Lawrence Seaway.