The head of the Royal Canadian Navy delivered a poignant reminder
Wednesday that the fate of Canada’s military is in industry’s hands as
he announced that a design for new resupply ships has been chosen.
The relationship between National Defence and defence companies has
been turbulent recently following problems with a number of high-profile
procurement projects, including the F-35 stealth fighter, armoured
vehicles for the army and search-and-rescue aircraft.
Some of these issues have originated within National Defence and
other federal departments, others have been industry’s fault. The
result, however, has been the same: delays, cost overruns, and project
cancellations or resets.
Vice-Admiral Paul Maddison said "The Royal Canadian Navy has placed its future in a very real way into your hands."
Speaking to a room full of defence company representatives during a
major arms-trade show in Ottawa, Vice-Admiral Paul Maddison noted that
the huge opportunity inherent in the Conservative government’s promise
to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in Canadian military equipment
over the next two decades.
“If we are to collectively succeed, it will be because we enter into
this great enterprise in a genuine spirit of strategic trust and
co-operation, of frank and honest dialogue and respect,” he said.
Maddison appealed to industry representatives to look beyond their
own interests and do the right thing for the country and Canada’s men
and women in uniform.
“The Royal Canadian Navy has placed its future in a very real way
into your hands,” he said. “The same applies to the Canadian Armed
Forces as a whole.”
“We have done so with great optimism and confidence in your
ingenuity, your creativity, and your shared determination to succeed.
We’ve done so knowing that you have that sense of mission and purpose,
which surpasses the fates and fortunes of the firms that employ you.”
He said this is particularly true for the government’s $35-billion
national shipbuilding plan, which is emerging as one of the most complex
military procurements in Canadian military history.
Maddison, who retires in just over three weeks, said the three major
naval projects — new armed Arctic patrol ships; replacements for the
navy’s aging destroyers and frigates; and new resupply vessels — are
proceeding.
In particular, he revealed that a design had been chosen for the
resupply vessels, also called joint support ships, in late April
following an in-depth comparison between two options “based on
capability, cost and risk.”
The joint support ships were the subject of a Parliamentary Budget
Officer’s report at the end of February, which warned the project could
cost more than $1 billion more than the government had budgeted. The
government refuted the PBO’s findings.
Maddison would not reveal what design had been selected for the
vessels, nor could he say when the joint support ships will be built
thanks to a scheduling conflict with the Coast Guard’s new polar
icebreaker, the CCGS John G. Diefenbaker.
The joint support ships are desperately needed to replace the navy’s
two 45-year-old resupply vessels, which were supposed to have been
retired in 2012 and have become environmentally unsound and
prohibitively expensive to maintain.
But they are expected to be ready for construction at the same time
in 2017 as the Canadian Coast Guard’s new polar-class icebreaker, the
CCGS John G. Diefenbaker, and the Vancouver shipyard responsible for
both projects can only handle one project at a time.
Maddison said there is an “urgent” need to replace both the resupply
ships and Coast Guard’s existing heavy icebreaker, the 40-year-old CCGS
Louis St-Laurent.
“So the sequencing decision that’s going to be made is, you know, is
JSS built first or is the polar (icebreaker) built first,” he said. “So
we’ll see how that goes.”
The navy commander could not say whether the navy would still be able
to afford the new joint support ship design that had been chosen if
construction was delayed in favour of the icebreaker.
He also warned that he did not see the navy’s existing resupply
vessels lasting past the end of this decade, though he was confident
National Defence would be able to “find a way to innovatively mitigate
any capability gap that opens.”
No comments:
Post a Comment