The U.S. Army is running
out of heavy trucks and rail cars that can carry tanks and other
armored vehicles long distances. Armored vehicles that run on tracks
wear out quickly if they travel long distances. The tracks and the
“running gear” (wheels and related mechanical components) are not
durable, because of the heavy weight of these vehicles and the
vulnerability of these “track laying systems” that are used because they
are the only effective way to enable heavy vehicles to move cross
country. After moving about a thousand kilometers under its own power
the heavier (over 20 tons) tracked vehicles have to stop and replace
worn out components. Because of this, armies use special flatbed
railroad cars and tractor trailer trucks to move armored vehicles long
distances. Both the rail cars and special trucks owned by the U.S. are
wearing out and budget cuts are making it difficult to buy replacements.
A decade ago the army had about 2,000 Heavy Equipment
Transporters. Each consisted of a heavy duty tractor that could haul 80
ton tanks on a flatbed trailer. These M1000 HETs (Heavy Equipment
Trailers) cost about $400,000 each. The trailers weigh 25 tons and are
16.1 meters (52 feet) long and also carry lots of cargo, which they
often do when not hauling M-1 tanks or other armored vehicles. The 20
ton M1070 tractor that usually pulls this trailer has a six man cab, so
the tank crew can be carried as well. A decade of heavy use in Iraq and
Afghanistan has reduced the number of working trainers to about 1,500
and some of these are in need of refurbishment.
The situation is worse with the special rail cars. The army
bought 6,000 of these in the late 1960s but they only have a useful life
of fifty years. The 1,300 owned by the Department of Defense
have seen little use, but are dying of old age. New ones cost about
$150,000 each. Another 4,500 are actually owned by railroads but the
Department of Defense paid to equip them with the special features that
enable them to carry tanks. These were more heavily used (to carry other
cargo) and are all going to be gone because of old age.
The army can improvise, if need be, using stock flatbed rail
cars to carry tanks. It takes time to install additional features needed
for this. Meanwhile the army still has some tank transport capability
with the special tractor trailers, at least the ones that are not in the
shop because of heavy use in the last decade.
The rail car deal in the 1960s was in preparation for a major
conventional war with the Soviet Union. That threat is gone, but there
is still the possibility of tanks being needed in a hurry for some
future war. Being ready for such a movement (of tanks from army bases to
ports) is costly and may be too expensive in the face of budget cuts
and the need for so many other items of equipment. Then again, the
United States has deactivated most of the armored units it maintained
during the Cold War. Thus there are not nearly as many armored
battalions to move to ports. The thousands of rail cars built to move
tanks were built for a mobilization that is no longer possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment