Ushuaia tourism operators expressed concern and called for common sense to prevail after two major cruises finally decided this week not to call at in Argentine Tierra del Fuego after local authorities could not guarantee that the visiting vessels would not be exposed to the same intimidation tactics and delays experienced recently in Buenos Aires and earlier this year in the extreme south terminal because they include the Falkland Islands in their itineraries.
The Ushuaia terminal is the main
cruise hub of the extreme south…so far
After a letter sent with the guarantees request went unanswered, Seabourn
Sojourn and Veendam with 450 and 1.300 visitors simply omitted calling and/or
landing in Ushuaia and reports from the local media indicate that Holland
America Line has decided to cancel future calls and the mother corporation
Carnival Corporation is considering new itineraries for its cruise vessels in
the rest of the season.
The two vessels apparently after
omitting Ushuaia, called at Punta Arenas, Chile
in the Magellan Strait,
another important cruise terminal in the extreme south of the continent.
Earlier this month the Seabourn
Sojourn was boarded in Buenos Aires by a gang of radical thugs, with the
support of the maritime workers union and the passivity of law enforcement
agents and delayed until forced to sign a commitment not to call again at the Falklands,
based on a bill approved by several Patagonia provinces, the so called Gaucho
Rivero law, which bans from Argentine ports vessels involved in oil related
activities in the Falklands, but which is interpreted and made extensive to all
commercial activities.
After several hours and having
signed the cruise left for Uruguay,
visiting Montevideo and Punta del
Este, and this week was again expected in Ushuaia after calling at the Falklands.
The Ushuaia newspaper Diario
del Fin del Mundo also published that because of the incidents allegedly
Seabourne Sojourn is going to omit Ushuaia and other Argentine ports and sail
between Uruguay
and Chile via
the Falkland Islands.
Chile
has again become a main attraction for the cruise industry after Congress passed
a bill ending a ban on casino and gambling on board vessels while sailing in
Chilean waters. Punta Arenas the
hub of cruise activity in southern Chile
will be visited this season by 52 vessels with an estimated 62.000 visitors,
according to local authorities.
But the harassment and
intimidation by Argentine radical thugs with official ‘complicity’, of cruise
vessels calling in the Falklands and Argentina
has not gone down with out protests not only from the Foreign Office.
The president of the Ushuaia Chamber
of Tourism, Marcelo Lietti, as he did earlier this year, warned that the
implementation of the Gaucho Rivero Law is having an economic impact on the
local tourism industry and related activities.
Speaking to a local Ushuaia radio
Lietti said that the cruise companies have sold packages including the Malvinas
so it is hard to see how they can avoid that leg since they can be exposed to
legal demands and regarding the Gaucho Rivero Law he admitted that it is a
provincial bill and foreign companies work on the basis of ‘national (federal)
legislation’.
But what is important “we
estimate a loss of 18.000 visitors this season if this continues. This means
loss of jobs and activity for many small shops that live from the tourism
industry” said Lietti who anticipated he would address local authorities
because “these are not the methods to claim a national cause we all support”.
Likewise cruise operator Fabio de
Souza, head of Tolkeyen Patagonia called for common sense to prevail and said
“we have nothing to argue regarding the sovereignty claim, but we fear a
contagion effect from other cruise lines and a boomerang effect for our local
economy if this continues”.
“It is a complicated situation
because even when the provincial government authorizes cruise vessels to call
and extends the permits, a group of activists flying the Gaucho Rivero flag
will not allow vessels going or coming from Malvinas to berth in Ushuaia”, said
de Souza.
This week “we had this situation
with two vessels while others are already talking about omitting Ushuaia for
the rest of the season because of lack of guarantees by local authorities,
according to the information we have”.
“We have nothing to argue
regarding the sovereign claim over Malvinas, but we are beginning to have a
boomerang effect and we don’t know where the conflict is going to end and how
it is going to end”, added de Souza.
He pointed out that the cruise
industry is dominated by two or three main corporations, highly competitive but
when the interests of the industry are involved ‘they can act very much as a
corporation looking for what is better for all of them”.
De Souza went on to say that
leaving aside the additional complication “the current cruise season was not
entirely good since although we could be receiving more calls (up 16%) the fact
is that the vessels have less visitors, maybe working with 70% of last year’s
average”.
The head of Tolkeyen Patagonia
pointed out that the loss of activity in Ushuaia will be captured by Punta
Arenas in Chile.
“Let’s not be foolish: our
Chilean neighbours will take full advantage of the situation and will receive
the cruise vessels with open arms. They will try again to make Punta Arenas the
Antarctic logistics and cruise hub of the extreme south, a position currently
held by Ushuaia”, insisted de Souza.
“Let’s hope common sense prevails
and some kind of understanding can be reached because there are many jobs at
stake and a whole industry based on the cruise visits and related activities”,
concluded de Souza.
No comments:
Post a Comment