China
has, in the last few years, demanded that India turn over a contested area in
northeast India (Arunachal Pradesh, which China claims as a part of Tibet.)
China then escalated its demands by refusing to allow Indians born in the
disputed area to visit China. This Chinese behavior has angered India, which
two years ago implemented a five year plan to increase their ability to deal
with any Chinese aggression against Arunachal Pradesh. The Chinese claims have been on the books for
decades, but in the last four years China has become more vocal about it.
That's one reason India has been rapidly increasing its defense spending. But
since both nations have nuclear weapons, a major war over Arunachal Pradesh is
unlikely, but not impossible.
India
fears that China might try to carry out a lightning campaign (a few days, or a
week), and then offer peace terms (with China keeping all or part of Arunachal
Pradesh). Since neither country would be willing to start a full scale nuclear
war over Arunachal Pradesh (a rural area with a population of about a million
people, spread among 84,000 square kilometers of mountains and valleys), the
"grab and parley" strategy has to be taken seriously. In the meantime,
China keeps finding ways to annoy India over this issue.
Meanwhile,
India seems quite confident that they can handle China if a war breaks out in
this mountainous wilderness. Partly that's because India is playing defense
here, which always confers an advantage. But India's big advantage is that it
has recent (1999) combat experience in mountain warfare. China has not fought
since 1979, and what was in the hill country on the Vietnamese border. Not only
was India's combat experience recent, but it was in the same mountain range
(the Himalayas) where they face China.
That
1999 war got little publicity, so it's generally unknown outside India how much
that experience changed the Indian armed forces. That's not surprising. The foe
in that war, Pakistan, did not even officially admit to its role in that
undeclared war until 2010. Pakistan had always insisted that India was just
fighting Islamic terrorists (who were just trying to liberate Kashmir from
Indian rule) in 1999. But two years ago the names of 453 soldiers killed in
"the Kargil war" were posted on the Pakistani Army website. Although
the Pakistani troops, masquerading as Islamic terrorists, were forced to
retreat during the 1999 conflict, Pakistan still considered it a victory
(because it garnered much publicity for their terrorism campaign in Kashmir and
India chose not to mount a major invasion of Pakistan). India lost about 550
troops in the fighting. The elected Pakistani government of the time was
opposed to the Kargil operation, and tried to remove the head of the armed
forces (general Pervez Musharraf). In response, Musharraf staged a coup and
ruled the country for the next nine years.
Although
the Indians succeeded in forcing the Pakistanis to retreat, the unexpected
conflict exposed deficiencies in the equipment, training and tactics of the
Army and Air Force as well as the ability of the two services to coordinate
their operations. The Indian military was not keen on giving a lot of publicity
to the problems they had during the 74 day Kargil campaign. But in the last
decade, it's been noted that Indian military reformers often invoke Kargil, and
that tends to help overwhelm opposition to needed changes. This has led to more
attention being paid to what went on during the high altitude (4,000 meters and
up) conflict.
As a
result of Kargil the army has purchased a lot of new high-tech gear for its
infantry, revised training methods and even changed the organization of
infantry battalions. The air force has bought more heavy transports (American
C-17s) and set up closer and continuous coordination with the army and navy.
The air force has studied the unique conditions encountered over these high
mountains and trained their pilots to deal with it. The Chinese are just now
catching up with this item.
No comments:
Post a Comment